Minutes: [aapi] UAI TF Meeting Tue Sep 24 2013

Link:  http://www.w3.org/2013/09/24-aapi-minutes.html

Plain text version follows:

    [1]W3C

       [1] http://www.w3.org/

                                - DRAFT -

            Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference
                               24 Sep 2013

    [2]Agenda

       [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2013Sep/0008.html

    See also: [3]IRC log

       [3] http://www.w3.org/2013/09/24-aapi-irc

Attendees

    Present
           Cynthia_Shelly, Joseph_Scheuhammer, Michael_Cooper

    Regrets
           David_Bolter

    Chair
           Joseph_Scheuhammer

    Scribe
           clown

Contents

      * [4]Topics
          1. [5]ISSUE-612
          2. [6]ACTION-1255
          3. [7]ACTION-1257
          4. [8]ACTION-1262
      * [9]Summary of Action Items
      __________________________________________________________

    <trackbot> Date: 24 September 2013

    RRSAgent: make log public

    <scribe> scribenick: clown

    topic ACTION-1256

    ACTION-1256?

    <trackbot> ACTION-1256 -- Joseph Scheuhammer to Modify msaa+uia
    express entry for aria-checked on menuitemradio button to use
    msaa selectable state and selected proerty instead of uia
    togglepattern. -- due 2013-09-24 -- PENDINGREVIEW

    <trackbot>
    [10]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1256

      [10] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1256

    [11]http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#mapping_role_
    table

      [11] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#mapping_role_table

    JS: we discussed this last week.
    ... Cynthia requested changes.
    ... I made the changes. Can you approve of them?
    ... <desribes the changes>

    CS: That looks good, we should probably copy it to the UIA
    column.

    JS: Can we make that an ARIA 1.1 issue?

    CS: Yes, let's do that.

    resolved: close ACTION-1256

ISSUE-612

    ISSUE-612?

    <trackbot> ISSUE-612 -- Review ia2/atk rule in group position.
    should this really determine level based on aria-owns chain.
    see uaig:
    [12]http://www.w3.org/wai/pf/aria-implementation/#mapping_addit
    ional_position and test case 69:
    [13]https://www.w3.org/wai/pf/testharness/testresults?tes --
    open

      [12] http://www.w3.org/wai/pf/aria-implementation/#mapping_additional_position
      [13] https://www.w3.org/wai/pf/testharness/testresults?tes

    <trackbot> [14]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/612

      [14] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/612

    JS: I think this is a david issue, and he's not here.
    ... Suggest we postpone this.

ACTION-1255

    ACTION-1255?

    <trackbot> ACTION-1255 -- Cynthia Shelly to Look into toggle
    patterns and how that needs to be modified in the uaig. -- due
    2013-09-24 -- OPEN

    <trackbot>
    [15]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1255

      [15] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1255

    CS: I was working on it, but I haven't finished it.
    ... give me until friday.

ACTION-1257

    ACTION-1257?

    <trackbot> ACTION-1257 -- Cynthia Shelly to Check the ie10 and
    ie11 to see how they map the treegrid role. -- due 2013-09-24
    -- OPEN

    <trackbot>
    [16]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1257

      [16] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1257

    CS: Not done yet.
    ... move to Friday also.

    Topci: ACTION-1219

    ACTION-1219?

    <trackbot> ACTION-1219 -- Joseph Scheuhammer to UAIG: passive
    RFC requirement: two instances of "The state change events MAY
    be trimmed out for performance" Who is this requirement for?
    Authors? UA? AT? Be specific. What does "trimmed out" mean? Be
    specific. -- due 2013-05-14 -- OPEN

    <trackbot>
    [17]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1219

      [17] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1219

    [18]http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#mapping_event
    s_selection

      [18] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#mapping_events_selection

    JS: It's the second table dealing with multiselectable
    containers.
    ... Suggesting for the third cell in the MSAA column

    "User agent MAY fire a EVENT_OBJECT_SELECTIONWITHIN. If this
    event is fired the other events noted above MAY be trimmed out
    for performance."

    CS: I think I'm okay with that, but just check with David.

    JS: I will check with david and alex.

    The user agent MAY fire a single object::selection_changed on
    the container vs. multiple for performance reasons

    CS: Sounds fine to me.
    ... I remember it was david who cared a lot about these.

ACTION-1262

    ACTION-1262?

    <trackbot> ACTION-1262 -- Joseph Scheuhammer to Update 4.1.
    focus states and events table to clarify differences between
    platforms and dom/desktop/at focus.
    [19]http://www.w3.org/wai/pf/aria-implementation/#focus_state_e
    vent_table -- due 2013-09-23 -- OPEN

      [19] http://www.w3.org/wai/pf/aria-implementation/#focus_state_event_table

    <trackbot>
    [20]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1262

      [20] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1262

    [21]http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#focus_state_e
    vent_table

      [21] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#focus_state_event_table

    JS: James Craig was intially against these events because he
    thought there were dom focus events.
    ... I explained that for MSAA, UIA, and ATK/AT-SPI, that these
    are aapi focus events.
    ... he wants that made perferectly clear.
    ... He also says that there is no distinction on the Mac under
    OS X a11y API.

    CS: I think that we actually should throw DOM events.
    ... But it doesn't work this way.

    <cyns> CS: I know that's not what's in ARIA 1.0, however

    JS: I think this is for the active descendant...

    <cyns> CS: So, if James wants a modification to the mac column,
    I'm ok with that

    JS: Actually, I think this is ambiguous: if it is an actve
    descendant scenario, these are aapi events. If a tabindex
    scenario, then DOM focus and these AAPI focus events are in
    sync.

    CS: Doesn't the table already say, in the opening sentence,
    that these are a11y api events?

    JS: Good point.

    CS: Ask James to propose text. It seems really clear to me
    already.

    <cyns> CS: if the problem is that AAPI and DOM events are the
    same thing on Mac, maybe the right answer is for the Mac column
    to say "no mapping" or "no event"

    <cyns> CS: these events are separate on teh other platforms,
    and devs on those platforms won't be confused.

    <cyns> CS: we could add a redundant sentence before the table,
    though I do think it's quite clear already

    JS: Okay. I will bring it up at next Monday's call (if time).

    zakim Microsoft is Cynthia_Shelly

    RRSAgent: logging off

    RRSAgent: off

    regrests: David_Bolter

Summary of Action Items

    [End of minutes]
      __________________________________________________________


     Minutes formatted by David Booth's [22]scribe.perl version
     1.138 ([23]CVS log)
     $Date: 2013-09-24 20:10:31 $
      __________________________________________________________

      [22] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
      [23] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/


-- 
;;;;joseph.


'A: After all, it isn't rocket science.'
'K: Right. It's merely computer science.'
              - J. D. Klaun -

Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2013 20:16:43 UTC