Re: Minutes: [aapi] UAI TF Meeting Tue Nov 05 2013

A quick question about aria-colindex and aria-rowindex, are the accepted 
values for this based on an array index, or do the values start with 1?

E.G

aria-colindex="0" and aria-rowindex="0" = col 1 row 1?

Or would it be:

aria-colindex="1" and aria-rowindex="1" = col 1 row 1?

I'm building an ARIA Grid component at the moment, so I can just plug this 
in for future support if it's a definite for the spec.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joseph Scheuhammer" <clown@alum.mit.edu>
To: <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 12:44 PM
Subject: Minutes: [aapi] UAI TF Meeting Tue Nov 05 2013


> Link:  http://www.w3.org/2013/11/05-aapi-minutes.html
>
> Plain text version follows:
>
>    [1]W3C
>
>       [1] http://www.w3.org/
>
>                                - DRAFT -
>
>            Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference
>                               05 Nov 2013
>
>    [2]Agenda
>
>       [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2013Nov/0000.html
>
>    See also: [3]IRC log
>
>       [3] http://www.w3.org/2013/11/05-aapi-irc
>
> Attendees
>
>    Present
>           Bryan_Garaventa, Joseph_Scheuhammer, Michael_Cooper,
>           David_Bolter, Cynthia_Shelly
>
>    Regrets
>    Chair
>           Joseph_Scheuhammer
>
>    Scribe
>           clown
>
> Contents
>
>      * [4]Topics
>          1. [5]Issues/Actions
>          2. [6]Bugzillas.
>          3. [7]1.1. Issues and Actions
>      * [8]Summary of Action Items
>      __________________________________________________________
>
>    <trackbot> Date: 05 November 2013
>
>    <scribe> scribenick: clown
>
> Issues/Actions
>
>    [9]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/10
>
>       [9] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/10
>
>    JS: The document is going to go last call very soon.
>
>    MC: It was supposed to be today, but it might not be until
>    tomorrow but with today's date.
>
>    JS: there are two issues and one action in the list for the
>    UAIG.
>    ... The two issues are Michael's and they will happen when they
>    happen.
>
>    MC Right, there not important for this meeting.
>
>    CS: The issue-616 is closed. Close the action?
>
>    action-1284?
>
>    <trackbot> action-1284 -- Cynthia Shelly to Start the
>    conversation re keeping issue-616 feature in the spec on list,
>    realizing it may go lc at risk. we need to determine what to do
>    by next tuesday. -- due 2013-10-29 -- CLOSED
>
>    <trackbot>
>    [10]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1284
>
>      [10] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1284
>
>    JS: The discussion will pick up again in the 1.1 time frame.
>    ... So, move the action to 1.1?
>
>    CS: So, I just moved it to 1.1
>
> Bugzillas.
>
>    [11]https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=Platfo
>    rm%20APIs&list_id=3116&product=ARIA
>
>      [11] 
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=Platform%20APIs&list_id=3116&product=ARIA
>
>    JS: there are two open bugs.
>    ... first on is
>    :[12]https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22131
>    ... I think this is a best practices issue.
>
>      [12] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22131
>
>    MC: This bugzilla has component "UAIG".
>
>    DB: Do we have other components for the ARIA product.
>
>    MC: There is also the issue of whether to use bugzillla going
>    foward, or how to best use it.
>    ... What component to use?
>
>    DB: Either "general" or "best practices".
>
>    MC: Let's set up "General".
>
>    JS: any way to move this bug to the new "General" component?
>
>    MC: Yes, just edit the bug, and reset the component.
>    ... <notices an email to google> I should change that old email
>    address.
>
>    [13]https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7044
>
>      [13] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7044
>
>    CS: That is listed a version 1.0
>
>    DB: That should be changed to 2.0
>
>    <davidb> [discussion about bug history]
>
>    CS: I looked at it back in 2009, but thought we didn't have
>    time then.
>
>    DB: We could let it lie, or move it to an issue.
>
>    JS: Is it more likely to be picked up if an ARIA 2.0 issue or
>    ARIA 1.1?
>
>    CS: I think it should be an issue, and 1.1. timeframe is
>    reasonable.
>    ... I can make an issue for this.
>
>    DB: Let's put a link to the bugzilla in the issue.
>
>    [14]http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#mapping_state
>    -property
>
>      [14] 
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#mapping_state-property
>
>    list item number 5.
>
>    <cyns> Bug 7044 moved to issue 628
>    [15]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/628
>
>      [15] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/628
>
> 1.1. Issues and Actions
>
>    [16]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/17
>
>      [16] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/17
>
>    issue-398?
>
>    <trackbot> issue-398 -- Errata: aria-setsize and aria-posinset
>    should apply to more than just listitem and option -- open
>
>    <trackbot> [17]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/398
>
>      [17] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/398
>
>    JS: instead of posinet and setsize for grids, Chrome suggested
>    aria-colindex and aria-rowindex.
>
>    CS: Seems like a good idea.
>
>    <davidb> agreed
>
>    CS: Next week is TPAC. Should we have this call next week?
>    ... I will be at TPAC.
>
>    JS: I will discuss it with you later, David.
>
>    <davidb> DB: awesome
>
>    s/MC\: Right/MC: Right/
>
>    s/MC Right/MC\: Right/g
>
> Summary of Action Items
>
>    [End of minutes]
>      __________________________________________________________
>
>
>     Minutes formatted by David Booth's [18]scribe.perl version
>     1.138 ([19]CVS log)
>     $Date: 2013-11-05 20:40:12 $
>      __________________________________________________________
>
>      [18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
>      [19] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
>
> Scribe.perl diagnostic output
>
> -- 
> ;;;;joseph.
>
>
> 'A: After all, it isn't rocket science.'
> 'K: Right. It's merely computer science.'
>              - J. D. Klaun -
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2013 21:13:46 UTC