Minutes: [aapi] UAI TF Meeting Tue Nov 05 2013

Link:  http://www.w3.org/2013/11/05-aapi-minutes.html

Plain text version follows:

    [1]W3C

       [1] http://www.w3.org/

                                - DRAFT -

            Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference
                               05 Nov 2013

    [2]Agenda

       [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2013Nov/0000.html

    See also: [3]IRC log

       [3] http://www.w3.org/2013/11/05-aapi-irc

Attendees

    Present
           Bryan_Garaventa, Joseph_Scheuhammer, Michael_Cooper,
           David_Bolter, Cynthia_Shelly

    Regrets
    Chair
           Joseph_Scheuhammer

    Scribe
           clown

Contents

      * [4]Topics
          1. [5]Issues/Actions
          2. [6]Bugzillas.
          3. [7]1.1. Issues and Actions
      * [8]Summary of Action Items
      __________________________________________________________

    <trackbot> Date: 05 November 2013

    <scribe> scribenick: clown

Issues/Actions

    [9]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/10

       [9] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/10

    JS: The document is going to go last call very soon.

    MC: It was supposed to be today, but it might not be until
    tomorrow but with today's date.

    JS: there are two issues and one action in the list for the
    UAIG.
    ... The two issues are Michael's and they will happen when they
    happen.

    MC Right, there not important for this meeting.

    CS: The issue-616 is closed. Close the action?

    action-1284?

    <trackbot> action-1284 -- Cynthia Shelly to Start the
    conversation re keeping issue-616 feature in the spec on list,
    realizing it may go lc at risk. we need to determine what to do
    by next tuesday. -- due 2013-10-29 -- CLOSED

    <trackbot>
    [10]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1284

      [10] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1284

    JS: The discussion will pick up again in the 1.1 time frame.
    ... So, move the action to 1.1?

    CS: So, I just moved it to 1.1

Bugzillas.

    [11]https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=Platfo
    rm%20APIs&list_id=3116&product=ARIA

      [11] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=Platform%20APIs&list_id=3116&product=ARIA

    JS: there are two open bugs.
    ... first on is
    :[12]https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22131
    ... I think this is a best practices issue.

      [12] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22131

    MC: This bugzilla has component "UAIG".

    DB: Do we have other components for the ARIA product.

    MC: There is also the issue of whether to use bugzillla going
    foward, or how to best use it.
    ... What component to use?

    DB: Either "general" or "best practices".

    MC: Let's set up "General".

    JS: any way to move this bug to the new "General" component?

    MC: Yes, just edit the bug, and reset the component.
    ... <notices an email to google> I should change that old email
    address.

    [13]https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7044

      [13] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7044

    CS: That is listed a version 1.0

    DB: That should be changed to 2.0

    <davidb> [discussion about bug history]

    CS: I looked at it back in 2009, but thought we didn't have
    time then.

    DB: We could let it lie, or move it to an issue.

    JS: Is it more likely to be picked up if an ARIA 2.0 issue or
    ARIA 1.1?

    CS: I think it should be an issue, and 1.1. timeframe is
    reasonable.
    ... I can make an issue for this.

    DB: Let's put a link to the bugzilla in the issue.

    [14]http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#mapping_state
    -property

      [14] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#mapping_state-property

    list item number 5.

    <cyns> Bug 7044 moved to issue 628
    [15]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/628

      [15] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/628

1.1. Issues and Actions

    [16]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/17

      [16] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/17

    issue-398?

    <trackbot> issue-398 -- Errata: aria-setsize and aria-posinset
    should apply to more than just listitem and option -- open

    <trackbot> [17]https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/398

      [17] https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/398

    JS: instead of posinet and setsize for grids, Chrome suggested
    aria-colindex and aria-rowindex.

    CS: Seems like a good idea.

    <davidb> agreed

    CS: Next week is TPAC. Should we have this call next week?
    ... I will be at TPAC.

    JS: I will discuss it with you later, David.

    <davidb> DB: awesome

    s/MC\: Right/MC: Right/

    s/MC Right/MC\: Right/g

Summary of Action Items

    [End of minutes]
      __________________________________________________________


     Minutes formatted by David Booth's [18]scribe.perl version
     1.138 ([19]CVS log)
     $Date: 2013-11-05 20:40:12 $
      __________________________________________________________

      [18] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
      [19] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

-- 
;;;;joseph.


'A: After all, it isn't rocket science.'
'K: Right. It's merely computer science.'
              - J. D. Klaun -

Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2013 20:44:30 UTC