- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:53:15 +0200
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>, David Bolter <dbolter@mozilla.com>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, HTMLwg <public-html@w3.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, wai-xtech-request@w3.org, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Jonas Sicking, Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:48:20 -0700: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jonas, >>> >>> ARIA is going through Candidate Recommendation so changing the browser >>> implementation this late in the game is problematic. I read through >>> the code >>> and I don't see what the patch does for accessibility. It appears >>> to simply >>> be iterating through valid ids that match the describedby reference. What >>> are you actually doing with this patch as it is not clear? >> >> Huh? I don't understand why the spec status affects the ability to fix bugs >> in the various implementations? Going to rec freezes the spec, not the >> implementations. > > Sorry, forgot to answer the questions regarding what the patch does. > > We already have code to expose longdesc to AT software. What the patch > does is that it detects that if an image doesn't have a longdesc > attribute, but does have a aria-describedby which points to a <a> or > <area> element with a href attribute, it exposes the link in that > <a>/<area> as being the location of the long description of the image. Can this be tested in a nightly build or something? If I get what you said right, then such a link is presented to - for instance - Jaws as if it was a @longdesc, right? -- Leif Halvard Silli
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2011 20:53:52 UTC