- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:46:05 +0200
- To: Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com>, "HTMLWG WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "W3C WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:36:19 +0200, Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com> wrote: > Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis writes: > >> On 17/08/2009 10:30, Smylers wrote: >> >> > If every instance of alt="" should also have role=presentation then >> > could we get user-agents to infer that? ... >> I'm suggesting that not every instance of alt="" should have >> role="presentation" (I agree) > That seems reasonable -- and would be a good reason for not warning all > authors using alt="" with a specific recommendation to add > role=presentation. Not necessarily. The logic runs like this: There is lots of alt="" out there. Some of it refers to stuff that doesn't need more text for understanding, and can be effectively treated as presentation. Adding role="presentation" would help distinguish this, IF there is some mechanism where authors who care add role="presentation", while authors who just want to pass a conformance test don't. In either case, I agree with Maciej that the spec should not tell software what not to show - dealing with these situations is messy enough that different heuristics for different users are going to matter for some time (at least until authoring improves, and I don't think that will be soon...) cheers chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg lærer norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Saturday, 22 August 2009 11:46:51 UTC