- From: David Bolter <david.bolter@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:58:06 -0400
- To: Victor Tsaran <vtsaran@yahoo-inc.com>
- CC: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>, wai-xtech@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 20 August 2009 17:58:50 UTC
Hi Victor, Hahaha! Seriously though, I guess the main thing is whether the browser should map it to something like an IA2_ROLE_UNKNOWN or not. If we take the example brought to our attention by James Teh, if an author were to do this: <body role=""> If we mapped this to a role on the native platform side, the AT would probably not create a virtual buffer, assuming that it is an interactive element, which is probably not the case. cheers, David On 8/20/09 1:50 PM, Victor Tsaran wrote: > Hmmm, wouldn't that be the case anyway? What happens now? > We could also define a role of "" whose purpose it would be not to do > anything.<LOL> > > > -----Original Message----- > From: wai-xtech-request@w3.org [mailto:wai-xtech-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis > Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 10:40 AM > To: David Bolter > Cc: wai-xtech@w3.org > Subject: Re: [AAPI] role="" > > On 20/08/2009 18:36, David Bolter wrote: > >> If an author (strangely) includes a role="", I'm thinking we can treat >> it the same as if the role is not specified at all. Thoughts? >> > > Makes sense to me. > > Would be nice if the WAI-ARIA spec defined that behavior. :) > > -- > Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis > >
Received on Thursday, 20 August 2009 17:58:50 UTC