Re: HTML5-warnings - request to publish as next heartbeat WD

On Aug 13, 2009, at 22:54, John Foliot wrote:

> Henri Sivonen wrote:
>> The email you cite is not an objection from the PFWG. It is an email
>> by individuals. The overlap with PFWG participants is small.
> For the record:
> WAI does not have a formal 'membership',

The PFWG has, though.

> Is there a problem with that?

I wasn't pointing out any problem with the email itself. I was  
pointing out that a statement about provenance of the email wasn't  

When one is discussing HTML5 controversies (and especially when one is  
documenting them for the general public), I think it's important to be  
diligent and to keep statements factual to avoid inadvertently giving  
an embellished impression of the controversies.

Henri Sivonen

Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 07:53:29 UTC