- From: Schnabel, Stefan <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:51:48 +0100
- To: "Victor Tsaran" <vtsaran@yahoo-inc.com>, "James Craig" <jcraig@apple.com>, "Chris Blouch" <cblouch@aol.com>
- Cc: "David Bolter" <david.bolter@utoronto.ca>, "Joseph Scheuhammer" <clown@utoronto.ca>, <wai-xtech@w3.org>, "earl johnson" <earlj.biker@gmail.com>
Any attempts to "make-it-as-simple-as-possible" are justified and welcome as long as the overall harmonization idea is not forgotten. Also, the individual platforms and OS (PC, Mac etc.) have evolved differently and Mac users may simply expect different keystrokes sometimes on a web page to use elements they know from their OS .. As far as I have understood, ARIA is NOT about keyboard navigation. Its anticipations are that support for it is simply *there* built into the UA's for known roles. ARIA just needs that like a ship the water. As ARIA is a Band Aid for HTML5 with respect to roles, the AOL style guide is a glass bridge with respect to navigation for us JavaScript coders until this support is available in the UA's, and nobody knows when it will be the case. I believe when there is no consensus about common keyboard navigation AT will (and have to) find ways to support KB navigation for ARIA in the Rambo way and this is worse because there will be diversification which is a good thing for a nation but not for Web UI Elements. Keyboard Usage Standardization for Web UI Elements is mandatory and I wonder why this attempt has to be done by some committed people from industry. And yes. I know the reasons why. But sometimes there is no comfort in the truth. - Stefan -----Original Message----- From: wai-xtech-request@w3.org [mailto:wai-xtech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Victor Tsaran Sent: Mittwoch, 19. November 2008 21:34 To: James Craig; Chris Blouch Cc: David Bolter; Joseph Scheuhammer; wai-xtech@w3.org; earl johnson Subject: RE: [DHTML Style Guide] Tablist: why alt+del? Good points. ARIA will not go forward unless it is practical and works. Talk to anyone in the industry who has tried to incorporate into a mainstream product and you'll know what I mean. Victor -----Original Message----- From: wai-xtech-request@w3.org [mailto:wai-xtech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of James Craig Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 12:23 PM To: Chris Blouch Cc: David Bolter; Joseph Scheuhammer; wai-xtech@w3.org; earl johnson Subject: Re: [DHTML Style Guide] Tablist: why alt+del? Chris Blouch wrote: > I spent quite a bit of time trying to implement keyboard shortcuts > that didn't interfere with either the OS, browser or AT and after > doing a lot of testing with XP, Jaws, IE and FF the available list was > very very short. I believe one of the ideas going into the DHTML style > guide was that ARIA would allow an AT to know that the user had focus > on a widget and get out of the way. Without that it would be nearly > impossible to find a set that works cross-AT, cross- browser and > cross-platform. Do Mac Voiceover users care that control- J jumps > cells with Jaws on Windows? Do Windows users care that voiceover users > jump between headers using control+alt+h? I suggest that the set of > available key combinations that are as agnostic as the web sites we > want to implement them on is nearly null. In light of that, a clean > slate approach seems appropriate. Given no constraints on keystrokes > other than trying to give a nod to what is common (familiar) in > existing implementations to lower cognitive load, what would make the > most sense for navigating and controlling widgets? For what it's worth, I completely agree with you. The argument I've heard against that is that there needs to be a consistent mechanism for keyboard navigation even if not controlled by AT like a screen reader. To that, I replied that the user agent should implement the key commands. For example, I can activate the menus or form controls in Safari with or without VoiceOver. The same should be true of all ARIA widgets in that UA and AT control web application widgets in the exact same way as the desktop equivalents. Although I firmly believe this is the right approach, not all browsers currently support DOM mutation events properly, and that feature is required for this approach to be a practical solution. At this point, I've started mostly ignoring the DHTML Style Guide as an overly-complex, but nice-to-have stop-gap measure until user agents support all these controls natively. I'm not saying this to make enemies in the DHTML Style Guide Working Group, but that will probably happen anyway. I'd be more on board with the more simple approach Victor mentioned: very basic navigational controls, including the keystroke to open a contextual menu that contains all the more-complex methods of navigation and control. James
Received on Thursday, 20 November 2008 07:52:39 UTC