- From: Aaron M Leventhal <aleventh@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 15:21:09 +0200
- To: "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>
- Cc: "James Craig" <jcraig@apple.com>, "W3C WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>, wai-xtech-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF37AE1395.68ACF43C-ONC1257457.0048D34A-C1257457.00498174@us.ibm.com>
Best Practices for authors is underway. I expect a lot more work to be done there. it's obvious we need that. IMO we want one document in the end, so that developers don't have to go to a separate style guide for the keyboard stuff. Others may say they need to stay separate. Best Practices for user agents is really the ARIA User Agent Implementors Guide, which is a collaboration between the various UA manufacturers, insomuch as the developers have time. The W3C may eventually be willing to host it, but it might not become a doc appropriate for that. This is full of technical details and not really that appropriate for most authors. http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/ARIA_User_Agent_Implementors_Guide Best Practices for ATs is interesting, but nobody has wanted to tell ATs what they should or shouldn't do. From my point of view the expected behavior for end users is still being defined as ATs evolve to better support ARIA this year. It's true that there should be more help for authors. IMO where we can be strong in our statements we should really put this info into #1, the authoring guide. I don't think this needs to be a separate doc otherwise all the authors and AT developers will end up needing to read both. But, if someone wants to step forward and write it I won't stop them! :) There's no one person or company "responsible" for ARIA. If you're here now, you're really on the cutting edge and part of defining ARIA, and where you find gaps, go ahead and get them addressed. - Aaron From: "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com> To: Aaron M Leventhal/Cambridge/IBM@IBMUS Cc: "James Craig" <jcraig@apple.com>, "W3C WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>, <wai-xtech-request@w3.org> Date: 05/28/2008 01:42 PM Subject: RE: alertdialog versus dialog questions, also modal versus non-modal Ok thanks. Interesting in your reply was also that a defined behavior of AT was/is presumed as part of the use case when encountering these kind of roles, whereas there is no separate “Best Practices for AT” document available yet covering these cases. I feel that this is still a gap bringing some lugubrious aspect in the game for there is still much room for interpretation, even also for AT XYZ. So, to complete picture, on my wish list would be 1. ARIA - Best Practices for Authors 2. ARIA - Best Practices for User Agents 3. ARIA - Best Practices for Assistive Technology Part of 3. would be e.g. rules not to suppress Alt+ArrowDown key combinations for JS code in toolkits (for role=combobox may need an expandable popup below that should work with recommended best practices keyboard definitions for opening) .. generally not to suppress all key combinations given there. Best Regards Stefan From: Aaron M Leventhal [mailto:aleventh@us.ibm.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 28. Mai 2008 12:59 To: Schnabel, Stefan Cc: James Craig; W3C WAI-XTECH; wai-xtech-request@w3.org Subject: RE: alertdialog versus dialog questions, also modal versus non-modal There is really no complete guide for authors yet. I agree we need that. - Aaron From: "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com> To: Aaron M Leventhal/Cambridge/IBM@IBMUS, "James Craig" <jcraig@apple.com> Cc: "W3C WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>, <wai-xtech-request@w3.org> Date: 05/28/2008 12:54 PM Subject: RE: alertdialog versus dialog questions, also modal versus non-modal I had the same question in mind. More of that kind of background info in best practices docs related to role usage use cases, please J - Stefan From: wai-xtech-request@w3.org [mailto:wai-xtech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Aaron M Leventhal Sent: Mittwoch, 28. Mai 2008 11:41 To: James Craig Cc: W3C WAI-XTECH; wai-xtech-request@w3.org Subject: Re: alertdialog versus dialog questions, also modal versus non-modal Looks like my last response didn't make it through, so I'll try again. It's a useful for a screen reader to know if the current container is an alertdialog vs. a dialog. Typically a dialog is not read from start to end. The title, current focus, and probably any groupbox or pane title would be read. Otherwise you'd get quite verbose preferences dialogs. It wouldn't be useful to read the whole thing from start to end. However, in many cases you don't want the user to miss the main message of a dialog. An alertdialog is just a simple message like "Your mailbox is full, please clean unwanted mails, Ok, button". Because the screen reader knows it's an alertdialog is knows to read the whole thing as soon as anything in the dialog gets focused. There is no way currently to indicate that a dialog is modal or modeless. I'm not sure how a sighted person figures this out, other than knowing from context or trying to focus outside of the dialog. If someone can state an important reason to expose that then it should be considered after ARIA 1.0. IIRC the group has decided not to take on new properties since we're trying to get the spec ready for last call. - Aaron From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> To: W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org> Date: 05/28/2008 01:37 AM Subject: alertdialog versus dialog questions, also modal versus non-modal Apologies if this question has already been discussed, but I fail to see a meaningful difference in the ARIA roles for alertdialog and dialog. AFAIK, the only discussion of this on the xTech list is the following, where Al points out an implementation problem with @role="alert dialog" http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2008Apr/0028.html Implementation issues aside, it seems to me that there is no meaningful difference between an alert dialog and a standard dialog. Both roles use an application window that receives focus and requires some form of user input or acknowledgment. If this is true, they should both be standard dialogs, because @role="dialog" appears to be just a child role of @role="alert" that also receives focus. Please correct me if I'm missing something in the reading or implementation. For reference: alertdialog <http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/#alertdialog> A separate window (may be simulated) with an alert, where initial focus goes to the window or a control within it. dialog <http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/#dialog> A dialog is a small application window that sits above the application and is designed to interrupt the current processing of an application in order to prompt the user to enter information or require a response. The other bit that's not clear from this wording is how to achieve a modal versus non-modal dialog. Since dialog is "designed to interrupt the current processing of an application," I assume that means it maintains a "modal" state and intercepts all input until it is dismissed. Have I missed some other allowance for non-modal dialogs? Thanks, James Craig
Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2008 13:23:43 UTC