- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:53:14 +0000
- To: W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Aaron M Leventhal wrote: > What policy should be used by this content > in terms of interrupting the user or other content being presented? It > seems universal. Maybe it's just me, but it feels more prescriptive of what a user agent should do compared to other attributes and their values. > The idea of "importance" was rejected because no author wants to > describe their content as "unimportant". It also doesn't really > describe how the interruptions should work. I wonder though which authors want to class their content as "rude". And again, not sure if the description of how it should work in a UA happens in other attributes/values, or at least in the same way/connotation. But then again, this might just be my personal interpretation. P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com ______________________________________________________________ Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 8 December 2008 20:53:56 UTC