- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:35:50 +0900
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, public-html@w3.org, wai-xtech@w3.org
Le 30 juil. 2007 à 22:10, Lachlan Hunt a écrit : > Now this is where there is a serious misunderstanding between us, > that seems to be causing the conflict. I'm not arguing that it is > or isn't, I'm questioning the possibility and looking for evidence > to show one way or the other. From my authoring perspective, > explicit associations increase complexity for authors, and so if > explicit associations can be avoided, they should be. If not, then > we should try and find the simplest way possible to express the > association. Mechanisms for creating explicit associations in HTML, trying to be very general. So we can see what kind of authoring pattern is the easiest. * links A document A links to a resource B somewhere on the network. <link rel="stylesheet" href="http://example.org/foo.css" type="text/css" media="screen"/> * nested elements A nested element A is defined to have a "meaningful" relationship with the nesting element B. <object… <p>…content…</p> </object> * Attribute values The value of an attribute defines the element it belongs too. <p title="value"> …content… </p> * anchors Two elements in a page are associated by a anchor <cite><a href="#anais">Anais</a></cite> … <p id="anais">Anaïs Nin (February 21, 1903 - January 14, 1977) was a French-born author of Spanish, Cuban, and Danish</p> Others? -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2007 05:35:55 UTC