- From: Ben Maurer <bmaurer@andrew.cmu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 10:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
- cc: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, Chris Blouch <cblouch@aol.com>, Colin McMillen <mcmillen@cs.cmu.edu>, wai-xtech@w3.org
Hey, On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Joshue O Connor wrote: > Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote: >> ben wrote: >>> The focus-moving is mostly for the demo. It makes it much easier >>> to try out the demo (sort of like the google.com homepage). Also, >>> we move the focus to the input box after you switch to/from an >>> audio captcha. Any thoughts on this? >> unquote >> >> when you need to open the audio captcha challange in a media player, >> like as not, focus is going to be grabbed by the media player, unless >> one is quick enough to cycle back to the page [...] > > Thats exactly what happens. I just did some testing of the CAPTCHA. It > was rather clumsy as the opened file must be stopped and started by the > user while they toggle backwards and forwards between the browser and > the media player. Also the user has to listen attentively for the audio > - as well as the output from the screen reader - and one can drown out > the other. In our test the media player appeared embedded within the > widget but it seemed to be inaccessible because when viewing or > listening to content embedded within a media player that is embedded > within a browser, the keyboard shortcuts that the screen reader user > activates to play or to stop the embedded content are in the control of > the browser and not of the media player. In our test the user could tab > through the controls of the media player (in this case windows media > player) but there was no screen reader output when these controls had > focus. Did the embedded player work at all (did it play a sound, but the controls didn't work) If so, we can just hide the actual controls. We may be able to implement a "play again" button. An example of this is: http://google.com/accounts/NewAccount Does that page's captcha work any better. > This was not an issue when we downloaded the audio file by clicking on > the "can't hear the audio button?" but as Gregory mentioned the user > then has to somehow control the audio, cycle back to the page etc. So it > is not ideal, even though it works. That button is a fallback. Nothing more, nothing less. Was the button easily discoverable even though it was inserted behind the "switch to audio " button in the dom? Also, how was the experience finding that button (eg the tab order issues we've commented about) -b
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2007 17:19:46 UTC