- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:37:10 +1100
- To: Dean Jackson <dean@w3.org>
- Cc: wai-xtech@w3.org
Personally I don't consider that SVG needs to be final form - it provides plenty of capacity through the metadata, title, desc attributes for storing original data as well. The source can be identified (in the example of an SVG that has been turned into a stripped-down final form version for bandwidth reduction) through the metadata element - I wonder if we should propose a particular way of doing this. There is Dublin Core that can identify versions of the same resource... cheers Chaals On Wednesday, Feb 19, 2003, at 12:04 Australia/Melbourne, Dean Jackson wrote: > * 2.11 Specific checkpoint for Final-form applications. > Can you explain what "Allow the author to identify by URI the source > used to > generate the final form instance" means? Does "final-form" > mean the result of something like an XSLT transform? > Actually I don't understand the other two provisions as well! Sorry :) > > My question really is: "Do you consider SVG final-form?" > If the answer is yes, then what do the provisions mean in > the context of SVG? > -- Charles McCathieNevile charles@sidar.org Fundación SIDAR http://www.sidar.org
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2003 02:22:00 UTC