- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 11:49:06 -0400
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- CC: 3WC WAI X-TECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > This question is forwarded with permission from Astrid Callista: > > What is meant (in checkpoint 1.3 [1]) by "accessible modules"? Are these > modules created by the author of the program? > > [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/XML/xag-20020617#cp1_3 - "1.3 Reuse existing > accessibility modules to indicate alternative-equivalent associations". > > From acomments I sent last October on XAG [1]: > IJ: I think I prefer might be "accessibility modules" to > "accessible modules". I think it might be useful to preface > the requirement a little with something like: > "When building a format out of smaller modules, reuse > proven accessibility modules." > > Why would one only be interested in reuse of modules related to > alternative equivalents? Are there other functionalities that benefit > accessibility (e.g., metadata) that might be reusable? > I also suggested mergin 2.9 with 1.3 into: "Reuse modules, and reuse them appropriately." Can one define an "XML Module"? _ Ian [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-tech-comments/2001Sep/0027 -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2002 11:51:53 UTC