- From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@topologi.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 01:44:23 +1000
- To: "WAI Cross-group list" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org> wrote >> * "no clear cut." > CMN But that isn't a position the group has agreed on. A thumbs-up character > or a smiley face is readable to a lot more people than using a non-zero > integer or the keyword "true", although it does present problems that require > resolution. But the argument is that absolute restrictions on names in XML > 1.1 will not be the best outcome for accessibility. I am confused (not uncommon!) Al's summary says "The discussion was inconclusive" and gives a lot of reasons where unrestricted characters can cause problems, but Charles is saying the opposite, that there was a conclusive decision reached that unrestricted characters are positively good. Sorry to be dense, Rick Jelliffe
Received on Sunday, 7 July 2002 11:31:17 UTC