RE: [XAG] auto-testing cp 1.1, 1.2, 2.1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:charles@w3.org]

> Guideline 1 - how to test for whether media alternatives are 
> permitted?
> 
> For checkpoint 1.1 and 1.2 there are only very vague 
> diagnostics that I could
> come up with. 

Shouldn't the ideal case be that individual media are recognisable?
<mediaObject>
  <text> Textual version </text>
  <image url=''/>
  <audio url=''/>
</mediaObject>

???

That sort of structure stops the scrabbling around trying to guess
which media is prime, alternate etc.



> A second test would check for the containment model where 
> elements that
> included media could appear - if they have to be inside 
> another element which
> can have variable content then that could be used as the 
> method (this is what
> SMIL does).


Which I think is similar, i.e. each media is recognisable?

regards DaveP

- 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the 
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, 
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If 
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your 
system.

RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any 
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are 
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email 
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk

Received on Monday, 19 August 2002 03:48:26 UTC