- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 20:42:40 -0400 (EDT)
- To: WAI Cross-group list <wai-xtech@w3.org>
comments are based on the June 17 2002 editor's draft - http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/XML/xag-20020617 Guideline 1 - how to test for whether media alternatives are permitted? For checkpoint 1.1 and 1.2 there are only very vague diagnostics that I could come up with. For elements who have an attribute that has a URI value, having content is good. It means that there is a possibility to provide content instead of anything that is included by reference, and to provide an explicit external alternative to things that are included as content. If people have used Xlink, then testing is particularly important for links which are embedded content rather than replacing the page. Testing both the DTD/Schema and some instance documents is helpful, since in DTDs it is not clear that an attribute value is a URI (as I understand it), but if that is typical of instance documents then it can be assumed. This test seems likely to give false results complaining about elements that are no problem, but fewer when testing can be based only on included content by inspecting the xlink. It also seems likely to miss content that is included directly - for example I wrote a paper using a DTD that required me to directly include TIFF or EPS image format data, so there was no URI. I am not sure how to test for that, although some could be done by looking for well-known strings such as identifiers for image types. A second test would check for the containment model where elements that included media could appear - if they have to be inside another element which can have variable content then that could be used as the method (this is what SMIL does). In some cases passing checkpoint 1.3 would suggest that the author has met these checkpoints. There isn't a formal proof, but since it could be a valid technique for meeting these checkpoints it is probably a positive indication. I think these checkpoints, and therefore these proposed techniques are closely related to checkpoint 2.1 chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe ---------------- WAI http://www.w3.org/WAI 21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia fax(fr) +33 4 92 38 78 22 W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Friday, 16 August 2002 20:42:40 UTC