- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 21:12:57 -0400 (EDT)
- To: <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>
- cc: <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Yes, it is a restriction to prefer IDs and there are real use cases where they shoudn't be preferred. But there are lots where they should. Maybe it is too strong a point to make in anything but general guidance on "how to choose URIs" and "how authoring tools should pick anchor points" Chaals On Tue, 13 Aug 2002 DPawson@rnib.org.uk wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:charles@w3.org] >> Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 6:17 AM >> I'm looking at the simple case where an Xpointer constructed >> by counting >> elements or something points to a thing with an ID already. >> (if the tool >> constructs an ID it is not certain that other tools will have >> this available >> to refer to without having an agreed way of assigning ID, and >> that gets >> circular...) >> >> IDs are normally the most robust things over changes. So an >> Xpointer tool >> could check for an ID and ask if there was any reason not to use it... > > >I've no objection to 'preferring' id's, but to say should is diminishing >the point of xpointer imo. One of its uses is to specify the third para >element, or the nth word in the mth para in the pth section. > >Seems like quite a restriction Charles? > >regards DaveP > >******** snip here ************ > >- > >NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is >confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the >intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, >disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If >you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender >immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your >system. > >RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any >attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it >cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are >transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. > >Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email >and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily >represent those of RNIB. > >RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 > >Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk > -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Wednesday, 14 August 2002 21:13:16 UTC