- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 14:06:54 -0400
- To: "gregory j. rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Actually, 'i' for "information" is good plain speak for metadata, which is what the headers are. 'Headers' is "traditional internet" jargon that fewer and fewer consumers will comprehend as time wears on. 'h' should, yes, always take you to [context-sensitive, if implemented] help. Al At 01:23 PM 2001-09-11 , gregory j. rosmaita wrote: >level: individual message view (append to appropriate hyperlinks) >what: actual message header (or, if not possible, archive-generated >pseudo-header) >accesskey: i, for "information" > >yes, it is a mnemonic stretch, but if i can "jump" directly to the actual >message - after the actual message header - i might want/need to "jump" back >to what i skipped - important bits, such as "other recipients", if one is >using an email client that respects only the reply-to or sender field, and >which neither automatically includes all recipients nor asks whether it >should > >2 things: > >1. the "chunked" navigation described above is, only theoretical, as i don't >know of an implementation of accesskey appended to DIV - to test your >favorite browser, point it towards cynthia shelly's "demo of chunk >navigation": ><http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/tests/divs.html>http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/tests/d ivs.html > >2. while "h" for "header" is (to english-speakers and those forced to think >in english on a regular basis) more intuitive, it is already the proposed >"universal" accesskey 'h', which, no matter what level you are at in the >archives, points to the ersatz W3C mailing list help document, which should >live at: > <http://www.w3.org/Help/Archives/>http://www.w3.org/Help/Archives/ > >gregory. >
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2001 13:43:09 UTC