- From: <DPawson@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 08:32:16 +0100
- To: asgilman@iamdigex.net, DPawson@rnib.org.uk, charles@w3.org, ivan@w3.org
- Cc: marja@w3.org, wai-xtech@w3.org
Al wrote: > If I recall correctly, what I took away from that exercise > was that it is > preferrable to put the text in the XML in a reasonable > reading order, and to > textref it into the layout from there. > > While it is mathematically possible to re-assemble the > reading order by > threading created in the markup, it is an inferior solution > in that authoring > processes are unlikely to get it right. The experience we > have had with > TABINDEX in HTML is relevant and cautionary. [Not a > rule-out, but genuinely a > warning.] DaveP. Agreed, is this one for the next SVG round? To add it to the accessibility section? the XY solution failed because the visual content was arranged in a two column table format. Linear extraction of text elements in document order would be very successful. Regards DaveP *************** snip here ************** - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
Received on Monday, 10 September 2001 03:36:54 UTC