Re: Action Item: 3.3 Proposal (Writing Style)

At 10:58 AM 3/13/2001 , Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>Moved to xtech for discussion that involves testability as well as
>requirement, and also implies authoring tool requirements. This thread began
>at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2001JanMar/0571 with the
>suggestion that the "write clearly" checkpoint be dropped, in part because
>there is no way to know when it has been met.

I just want to note that this is not the _only_ argument against
the checkpoint, by the way.  There are additional arguments which
Chaalz is not addressing here.


Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com>
Technical Developer Liaison
Reef North America
Tel +1 949-567-7006
________________________________________
ACCESSIBILITY IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL.
________________________________________
http://www.reef.com

Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2001 14:51:15 UTC