RE: Abbreviations

It isn't a problem to have them mixed in, since we anticipate extracting
glossary entries rather than directly referring to the glossary. But they do
need to be marked up as abbreviations. I think it is better in a spec to list
abbreviations seperately. Thoughts?

Charles

On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Katie Haritos-Shea wrote:

   At the moment we have API, DOM, ASCII, CTM, DTD, ................
   These are currently mixed in, should we also have an Abbreviations only
   area?

   So add............SVG, ULR/URI, WCAG, UAAG, PDF ?




   Katie Haritos-Shea
   508 Coordinator / Webmaster CIW
   NTIS -  US Department of Commerce
   5285 Port Royal Road
   Springfield, Virginia  22161 USA
   703-605-6426
   FAX:703-605-6734
   kshea@fedworld.gov
   kshea@ntis.gov




-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: 
+61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 
617 258 5999
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)

Received on Monday, 12 March 2001 23:12:19 UTC