RE: [wbs] response to 'Content Authors Curricula Starfish Review'

Hey Brian.

Many thanks for filling in the survey, and sorry for my late response.

Please see below for my comments.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Elton via WBS Mailer <sysbot+wbs@w3.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 4:18 PM
> To: dmontalvo@w3.org
> Subject: [wbs] response to 'Content Authors Curricula Starfish Review'
> 
> > Module 1: Clear Content
> >
> > ----
> > Please review Module 1: Clear Content
> >  * Are all points covered - is anything missing?
> >      * Is there anything in there that should not be in there?
> >      * Do you think we adequately addressed Open issues for Author
> > Module
> > 1: Clear Content
> > Please provide your comments in the below box or via:
> >  * GitHub Issue for Module 1: Clear Content
> >    * GitHub Pull Request for Author Module 1: Clear Content
> >
> >
> Comments:
> Have added an issue via Github.

I have now addressed and closed the issue. Feel free to reopen if needed.
https://github.com/w3c/wai-curricula/issues/531#issuecomment-1125977109

> > ---------------------------------
> > Module 2: Structure
> >
> > ----
> > Please review Module 2: Structure
> >  * Are all points covered - is anything missing?
> >    * Is there anything in there that should not be in there?
> > Please provide your comments in the below box or via:
> >  * GitHub Issue for Author Module 2: Structure
> >    * GitHub Pull Request for Author Module 2: Structure
> >
> >
> Comments:
> When describing heading levels, I think "hierarchy" is more accurate than "rank" and using proper hierarchy should be a learning outcome.

That is good point. I don't think we should get rid of "rank levels., though" I am not sure that hierarchy in itself communicates the appropriate use of heading rank levels. That is, how to achieve that hierarchy.
I took a pass at this in
https://content-author-modules--wai-curricula.netlify.app/curricula/content-author-modules/structure/#topic-headings

Are you comfortable with this new approach?

> In Orientation and Navigation Learning Outcomes, this line seems backwards to me - "methods to move from a footnote to its content and
> from its content back to the footnote." For me a "footnote" is the content, where the superscripted number or symbol could be called a
> footnote marker.
> Therefore I think this line should be "methods to move from a footnote marker to the related footnote content and from the footnote
> content back to the footnote marker."
> A similar update would be needed in the Teaching Ideas for Topic and Ideas to Assess Knowledge for Topic.

Thanks for raising this. I will amend throughout.

>  Regards,
> 
>  The Automatic WBS Mailer

--

Daniel Montalvo

Accessibility Education and Training Specialist
W3C/WAI

Received on Monday, 23 May 2022 13:24:13 UTC