Re: [wbs] response to 'Curriculum "Developing Accessible Content" -- Monkey Review'

Hey Crystal,

Thank you very much for going through the resource and providing your comments.

I have a couple of doubts. Please see below.


>> ---------------------------------
>> Module 4: Tabular Information
>> 
>> ----
>> Please focus on Module 4: Tabular Information.
>> * Are all points covered - is anything missing?
>> * Is there anything in there that should not be in there?
>> You can comment below or leave a GitHub Issue about Tabular Information.
>> 
> Comments: 
> I would consider adding information about the importance of table scopes,
> for complex tables.
> 
I don’t fully understand what you mean by table scopes. Do you mean you would appreciate further coverage of the attribute `scope`? Do you miss explanations about the scope of complex tables, i.e. when they should be used and when they should not (use cases, etc)?
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------
>> Module 5: Forms and Input Elements
>> 
>> ----
>> Please focus on Module 5: Forms and Input Elements.
>> * Are all points covered - is anything missing?
>> * Is there anything in there that should not be in there?
>> * Do you agree with the overall topic structure?
>> You can comment below or leave a GitHub Issue about Forms and Input
>> Elements.
>> 
> Comments: 
> Looks well thought out.
> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------
>> Module 6: Custom Widgets
>> 
>> ----
>> Please focus on Module 6: Custom Widgets.
>> * Are all points covered - is anything missing?
>> * Is there anything in there that should not be in there?
>> You can comment below or leave a GitHub Issue about Custom Widgets.
>> 
> Comments: 
> Looks good.
> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------
>> Module 3: Images and Graphics
>> 
>> ----
>> Please focus on Module 3: Images and Graphics.
>> * Are all points covered - is anything missing?
>> * Is there anything in there that should not be in there?
>> You can comment below or leave a GitHub Issue about Images and Graphics.
>> 
> Comments: 
> In the Learning Outcomes for Module section, I would possibly add a point
> to address best practice alternative text writing. 
This is a very good point. As a follow-up, there will be subsequent curricula for designers and content authors (coming next year). We plan to extend on these types of guidance, specifically for the content authors. What are the missing aspects that you would add for a developer?
> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------
>> Module 2: Navigation and Menus
>> 
>> ----
>> Please focus on Module 2: Navigational Menus.
>> * Are all points covered - is anything missing?
>> * Is there anything in there that should not be in there?
>> You can comment below or leave a GitHub Issue about Navigational Menus.
>> 
> Comments: 
> Looks good.
> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------
>> Module 1: Structure and Semantics
>> 
>> ----
>> Please focus on Module 1: Structure and Semantics.
>> * Are all points covered - is anything missing?
>> * Is there anything in there that should not be in there?
>> You can comment below or leave a GitHub Issue about Structure and
>> Semantics.
>> 
> Comments: 
> Looks good.
> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------
>> Developing Accessible Content -- Overview Page
>> 
>> ----
>> Please focus on Developing Accessible Content (overview page).
>> * Are all points covered - is anything missing?
>> * Is there anything in there that should not be in there?
>> You can comment below or leave a GitHub Issue about Overview Page.
>> 
> Comments: 
> Great job!
> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------
>> Additional comments
>> 
>> ----
>> Use the space below to include any additional observations or concerns
>> you would like to see addressed.
>> Remember: This is the last review before the approval to publish survey.
>> 
> Additional Comments: 
> Overall well thought out and thorough.
> 
>> 
>> These answers were last modified on 9 October 2020 at 16:28:51 U.T.C.
>> by Crystal Carson
>> 
> Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/curriculum-developer-monkey-review/
> until 2020-10-13.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> The Automatic WBS Mailer
> 

---
Daniel Montalvo Charameli
Accessibility Education and Training Specialist
W3C/WAI

Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2020 14:40:54 UTC