Re: [wbs] response to 'WAI-Curricula: Draft Review for unit 4 "Standards and guidelines"'

Hello KrisssAnne:


thanks again for your comments.


Continuing with the review for unit 4, we have also changed the title of 
the units and topic to avoid confusion.


The outline is now as follows:


Unit 4: Principles, Guidelines, and Checks

     Topic: Principles of Web Accessibility
     Topic: W3C Accessibility Standards
     Topic: Hands-on Experience of Standards in Practice

Does this solve the issue for you?


Thanks.


Best.



Daniel.


On 8/29/2019 6:54 PM, Daniel Montalvo Charameli wrote:
> Hey KrisAnne:
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
> As per the order of topics, we have been making changes in the live 
> draft at
> https://deploy-preview-72--wai-curricula.netlify.com/curricula/1-4/
>
> I have also opened an issue
> https://github.com/w3c/wai-curricula/issues/89
>
> to further discuss this if necessary.
>
> The first topic explains the principles and talks about examples of 
> such principles, not requirements or success criteria, which are 
> introduced later on
> in the unit.
>
> Is it now clearer for you?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Best.
>
>
>
> On 8/27/2019 6:00 PM, Kris Anne Kinney via WBS Mailer wrote:
>> The following answers have been successfully submitted to 
>> 'WAI-Curricula:
>> Draft Review for unit 4 "Standards and guidelines"' (Education and 
>> Outreach
>> Working Group) for Kris Anne Kinney.
>>
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Overview
>>>
>>> ----
>>> This survey is for a first review of Unit 4: Standards and Guidelines
>>> teaching unit, as part of the Introduction to Web Accessibility" 
>>> teaching
>>> module.
>>>
>>> Background: WAI Curricula Requirements Analysis
>>>
>>> Focus for your review:
>>>   * Are all topics covered well? Is anything missing? Is anything in 
>>> there
>>> that shouldn't be?
>>>     * Try to note any significant issues at this point, so we can 
>>> address
>>> them now.
>>>     * Comments on details, including wording, are welcome at this 
>>> point.
>>> Feel free to comment in the below edit boxes or to open a New GitHub
>>> Issue
>>>
>>> Note: The review versions linked above will not change during the 
>>> review
>>> period. The editor will address some issues as they come in, so the 
>>> live
>>> draft might change during this review period. You might want to check
>>> GitHub issues and the live updates before doing your review: Live 
>>> draft -
>>> Unit 4 - Standards and Guidelines
>>>
>> Comments:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Review level and timing
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Please indicate below the level of consideration you were able to 
>>> provide
>>> for this review. If you were unable to get to it and would like more
>>> time, please indicate that as well. Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>   * ( ) I read the material carefully
>> .
>>   * (x) I skimmed the material
>>
>>   * ( ) I need more time and have put a date below when I can get to it.
>>   * ( ) I am not going to be able to review this material and will 
>> defer to
>> the decisions of the group.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Unit 4: Standards and Guidelines
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Focus on unit 4 Standards and Guidelines:
>>>   * Do you agree with the introduction, learning outcomes, and
>>> competences?
>>>     * Do you think Learning Outcomes and Ideas for Assessment are 
>>> coherent
>>> and feasible?
>>>     * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach?
>>>     * Do you have other thoughts, suggestions, or comments?
>>> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated
>>> GitHub Issue for Unit 4
>>>
>> Comments:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Topic: Principles of Accessible Design
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Focus on topic Principles of Accessible Design:
>>>   * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes?
>>>     * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework 
>>> Ideas
>>> are aligned?
>>>     * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the 
>>> scope
>>> of this topic?
>>>     * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach?
>>>     * Do you have further ideas or suggestions?
>>> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated
>>> GitHub Issue for Topic Principles of Accessible Design
>>>
>> Comments:
>> The last bullet for the Homework ideas is cut off.  Was someone 
>> coming back
>> to finish the sentence?
>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Topic:  Standards and Guidelines
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Focus on topic Standards and Guidelines:
>>>   * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes?
>>>     * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework 
>>> Ideas
>>> are aligned?
>>>     * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the 
>>> scope
>>> of this topic?
>>>     * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach?
>>>     * Do you have further ideas or suggestions?
>>> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated
>>> GitHub Issue for Topic Standards and Guidelines
>>>
>>>
>> Comments:
>> When we're talking about standards - are we talking about the broad
>> standards of WCAG, ATAG, and UAAG?  Not the success criteria that are 
>> under
>> each of the principles that we talked about earlier section.  If we're
>> talking broad scope - should the Standards and Guidelines section go 
>> first
>> before we drill into the principles of accessible design? Thinking of 
>> the
>> flow of the learning here.  Should this Topic have a different name than
>> the Unit name?  Would that potentially cause confusion?
>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Topic: First Checks for Web Accessibility
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Focus on topic First Checks for Web Accessibility:
>>>   * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes?
>>>     * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework 
>>> Ideas
>>> are aligned?
>>>     * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the 
>>> scope
>>> of this topic?
>>>     * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach?
>>>     * Do you have further ideas or suggestions?
>>> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated
>>> GitHub Issue for Topic First Checks for Web Accessibility
>>>
>>>
>> Comments:
>> This phrase "practice their knowledge " is tripping me up, and I know 
>> what
>> you're trying to say - but I don't think this is a good phrase. I'm 
>> trying
>> to think of something else.
>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------
>>> Any other Thoughts/suggestions?
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Any other thoughts or suggestions?
>>>
>>>
>> Comments:
>> all of my comments are "editors discretion" comments - as I know i'm so
>> behind in reviewing and evaluating these resources.
>>
>>> These answers were last modified on 27 August 2019 at 15:59:09 U.T.C.
>>> by Kris Anne Kinney
>>>
>> Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
>> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/standards-and-guidelines-draft-review/ 
>>
>> until 2019-08-28.
>>
>>   Regards,
>>
>>   The Automatic WBS Mailer
>>

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2019 10:52:35 UTC