- From: Daniel Montalvo Charameli <dmontalvo@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 16:55:38 +0200
- To: wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
Hello Vicki: I have included your suggested sentence at https://deploy-preview-50--wai-curricula.netlify.com/curricula/1-1/ This is the "live draft" and will be merged into master after we've had a discussion in EOWG teleconference. Thanks for pointing this out! > > > On 8/13/2019 1:36 PM, Vicki Menezes Miller via WBS Mailer wrote: > >> The following answers have been successfully submitted to >> 'WAI-Curricula: >> Thorough Review for units 1 and 2' (Education and Outreach Working >> Group) >> for Vicki Menezes Miller. >> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Overview >>> >>> ---- >>> Please read the complete drafts for Unit 1 and Unit 2. These are now >>> ready for thorough review. >>> Background: — To prepare for this questionnaire, you might want to have >>> a look at the following: >>> * The WAI-Curricula Requirements Analysis page >>> * July 12th minutes on WAI-Curricula >>> Thorough review! — Review everything at all levels, including >>> copy-editing. This is the "last call" before publication. >>> Feel free to comment in the below edit boxes or to open a New GitHub >>> Issue >>> >>> Note: The review versions linked above will not change during the >>> review >>> period. Daniel will address some issues as they come in, so the live >>> draft might change during this review period. You might want to check >>> GitHub issues and the live updates before doing your review: Live >>> draft - >>> Unit 1 and Live draft - Unit 2. >>> >> Comments: >> Very nice! >> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Review level and timing >>> >>> ---- >>> Please indicate below the level of consideration you were able to >>> provide >>> for this review. If you were unable to get to it and would like more >>> time, please indicate that as well. Thanks! >>> >>> >> * (x) I read the material carefully >> . >> * ( ) I skimmed the material >> >> * ( ) I need more time and have put a date below when I can get to it. >> * ( ) I am not going to be able to review this material and will >> defer to >> the decisions of the group. >> >> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Unit 1: What is Web Accessibility >>> >>> ---- >>> Focus on unit 1 What is Web Accessibility: >>> * Do you agree with the introduction, learning outcomes, and >>> competences? >>> * Do you think Learning Outcomes and Ideas for Assessment are >>> coherent >>> and feasible? >>> * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach? >>> * Do you have other thoughts, suggestions, or comments? >>> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated >>> GitHub Issue for Unit 1 >>> >> Comments: >> Very well done. >> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Topic: Stories of people with Disabilities >>> >>> ---- >>> Focus on topic Stories of People with Disabilities: >>> * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes? >>> * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework >>> Ideas >>> are aligned? >>> * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the >>> scope >>> of this topic? >>> * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach? >>> * Do you have further ideas or suggestions? >>> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated >>> GitHub Issue for Topic Stories of People with Disabilities >>> >> Comments: >> Very good. >> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Topic: Scope of Web Accessibility >>> >>> ---- >>> Focus on topic Scope of Web Accessibility: >>> * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes? >>> * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework >>> Ideas >>> are aligned? >>> * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the >>> scope >>> of this topic? >>> * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach? >>> * Do you have further ideas or suggestions? >>> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated >>> GitHub Issue for Topic Scope of Web Accessibility >>> >>> >> Comments: >> Very good. >> >> One minor comment on the following bullet. I'm not 100% comfortable >> that >> it is clear enough. A suggestion follows to expand it slightly. >> >> Current: >> "Define usability as the discipline in charge of designing products >> to be >> effective, efficient, and satisfying. Explain that accessibility is >> needed >> to cover those aspects from the perspective of people with >> disabilities." >> >> Suggestion: >> "Define usability as the discipline in charge of designing products >> to be >> effective, efficient, and satisfying. Describe some overlaps in >> usability >> and accessibility. Explain that accessibility is needed to cover those >> aspects from the perspective of people with disabilities." >> >> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Unit 2: People and Digital Technology >>> >>> ---- >>> Focus on unit 2 People and Digital Technology: >>> * Do you agree with the introduction, learning outcomes, and >>> competences? >>> * Do you think Learning Outcomes and Ideas for Assessment are >>> coherent >>> and feasible? >>> * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach? >>> * Do you have other thoughts, suggestions, or comments? >>> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated >>> >> Comments: >> Yes, agree. >> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Topic: Diverse Abilities, Tools, and Strategies >>> >>> ---- >>> Focus on topic Diverse Abilities, Tools, and Strategies: >>> * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes? >>> * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework >>> Ideas >>> are aligned? >>> * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the >>> scope >>> of this topic? >>> * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach? >>> * Do you have further ideas or suggestions? >>> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated >>> GitHub Issue for Topic Diverse Abilities, Tools, and Barriers >>> >>> >> Comments: >> Yes >> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Topic: Components of Web Accessibility >>> >>> ---- >>> Focus on topic Components of Web Accessibility: >>> * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes? >>> * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework >>> Ideas >>> are aligned? >>> * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the >>> scope >>> of this topic? >>> * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach? >>> * Do you have further ideas or suggestions? >>> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated >>> GitHub Issue for Topic Components of Web Accessibility >>> >> Comments: >> Yes >> >>> >>> --------------------------------- >>> Any other Thoughts/suggestions? >>> >>> ---- >>> Any other thoughts or suggestions? >>> >>> >> Comments: >> Bravo! >> >>> These answers were last modified on 13 August 2019 at 11:35:19 U.T.C. >>> by Vicki Menezes Miller >>> >> Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at >> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/unit12cr/ until 2019-08-13. >> >> Regards, >> >> The Automatic WBS Mailer >>
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2019 14:55:43 UTC