Re: [wbs] response to 'WAI-Curricula: Thorough Review for units 1 and 2'

+ wai-eo-editors list.


Thanks for getting back to this.


Yes, the relationship is that one you describe. The first item, 
"Competences", makes references to the required competences and skills 
(those that students and instructor need to have in order to take 
courses based on this curriculum). The second item "Ideas for 
assessment", is a guidance for instructors on how they could assess 
whether or not students have acquired the knowledge taught in these units.


It might need further refinement, though.


Best.


On 8/23/2019 11:07 AM, Estel·la Oncins Noguer wrote:
>
> Dear Daniel,
>
>
> I have gone through the documents again and now it is clear to me, 
> actually under "ideas for assessment" you also mean "acquired 
> competences or skills" through the learning process right? This is 
> what I understand.
>
>
> To me it is clear now if this is the relation.
>
>
> Sorry for the misunderstanding.
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Estel·la Oncins Noguer
> Post Doctoral Research Fellow TransMedia Catalonia
> Edifici MRA 126  - Campus UAB
> 08193 Bellaterra
> Barcelona
> T. +34 610 655 149
>
> orcid.org/0000-0002-0291-3036 <https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0291-3036>
> http://grupsderecerca.uab.cat/transmedia 
> <http://grupsderecerca.uab.cat/transmedia/>
> <http://grupsderecerca.uab.cat/transmedia/> 
> <http://grupsderecerca.uab.cat/transmedia/>
>
> <http://grupsderecerca.uab.cat/transmedia/>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *De:* Daniel Montalvo Charameli <dmontalvo@w3.org>
> *Enviat el:* dilluns, 19 d’agost de 2019 11:01:29
> *Per a:* Estel·la Oncins Noguer <Estella.Oncins@uab.cat>
> *Tema:* Re: [wbs] response to 'WAI-Curricula: Thorough Review for 
> units 1 and 2'
> Hi Stella:
>
>
> Absolutely! Feel free to get back to this when possible.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Best.
>
>
> On 8/19/2019 10:17 AM, Estel·la Oncins Noguer wrote:
> > Hello Daniel,
> >
> > Sorry I missed this E-mail and I was not able to attend the meeting 
> on Friday.
> >
> > I am currently out of office and have limited access to Internet. I 
> will be back on Wednesday can I recheck it and answer you then?
> >
> > Sorry about this.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Estel·la Oncins Noguer
> > Post Doctoral Research Fellow TransMedia Catalonia
> > Edifici MRA 126  - Campus UAB
> > 08193 Bellaterra
> > Barcelona
> > T. +34 610 655 149
> >
> > orcid.org/0000-0002-0291-3036
> > http://grupsderecerca.uab.cat/transmedia
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > De: Daniel Montalvo Charameli <dmontalvo@w3.org>
> > Enviat el: dijous, 15 d’agost de 2019 17:35:48
> > Per a: Estel·la Oncins Noguer <Estella.Oncins@uab.cat>; 
> shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org <shadi+EOsurvey@w3.org>; wai-eo-editors 
> <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
> > Tema: Re: [wbs] response to 'WAI-Curricula: Thorough Review for 
> units 1 and 2'
> >
> > Hi Stella:
> >
> > Many thanks for your comments and feedback.
> >
> > Let me ask you something.
> >
> >
> > On 8/14/2019 1:03 AM, Estella Oncins via WBS Mailer wrote:
> >
> > The following answers have been successfully submitted to 
> 'WAI-Curricula:
> > Thorough Review for units 1 and 2' (Education and Outreach Working 
> Group)
> > for Estella Oncins.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Overview
> >
> > ----
> > Please read the complete drafts for Unit 1 and Unit 2. These are now
> > ready for thorough review.
> > Background: — To prepare for this questionnaire, you might want to have
> > a look at the following:
> >   * The WAI-Curricula Requirements Analysis page
> >     * July 12th minutes on WAI-Curricula
> > Thorough review! — Review everything at all levels, including
> > copy-editing. This is the "last call" before publication.
> > Feel free to comment in the below edit boxes or to open a New GitHub
> > Issue
> >
> > Note: The review versions linked above will not change during the review
> > period. Daniel will address some issues as they come in, so the live
> > draft might change during this review period. You might want to check
> > GitHub issues and the live updates before doing your review: Live 
> draft -
> > Unit 1 and Live draft - Unit 2.
> >
> >
> >
> > Comments:
> > I think it would be good to differentiate between "competences" (in the
> > previous version prerequisites) and "acquired competences" through 
> learning
> > process of the unit which now seems to be under "ideas for assessment".
> > It is not clear the relation between the learning outcomes and the
> >
> > It seems you wanted to say something else but the text is missing, 
> right?
> >
> > If so, feel free to Open a New 
> Issue<https://github.com/w3c/wai-curricula/issues/new>
> > or send an email.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Review level and timing
> >
> > ----
> > Please indicate below the level of consideration you were able to 
> provide
> > for this review. If you were unable to get to it and would like more
> > time, please indicate that as well. Thanks!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >   * (x) I read the material carefully
> > .
> >   * ( ) I skimmed the material
> >
> >   * ( ) I need more time and have put a date below when I can get to it.
> >   * ( ) I am not going to be able to review this material and will 
> defer to
> > the decisions of the group.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Unit 1: What is Web Accessibility
> >
> > ----
> > Focus on unit 1 What is Web Accessibility:
> >   * Do you agree with the introduction, learning outcomes, and
> > competences?
> >     * Do you think Learning Outcomes and Ideas for Assessment are 
> coherent
> > and feasible?
> >     * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach?
> >     * Do you have other thoughts, suggestions, or comments?
> > Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated
> > GitHub Issue for Unit 1
> >
> >
> >
> > Comments:
> > Minor error (I think), in Unit 1 under "Ideas for Assessment" the first
> > point is "students" but then in the other points the term used is
> > "learners".
> > Maybe under "Ideas for Assessment" the same formula as in the "Learning
> > Outcomes" section can be used  "Learners should be able to:" and 
> indicate
> > all the points.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Topic: Stories of people with Disabilities
> >
> > ----
> > Focus on topic Stories of People with Disabilities:
> >   * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes?
> >     * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework Ideas
> > are aligned?
> >     * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the 
> scope
> > of this topic?
> >     * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach?
> >     * Do you have further ideas or suggestions?
> > Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated
> > GitHub Issue for Topic Stories of People with Disabilities
> >
> >
> >
> > Comments:
> > Excellent work, very clear structure
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Topic:  Scope of Web Accessibility
> >
> > ----
> > Focus on topic Scope of Web Accessibility:
> >   * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes?
> >     * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework Ideas
> > are aligned?
> >     * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the 
> scope
> > of this topic?
> >     * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach?
> >     * Do you have further ideas or suggestions?
> > Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated
> > GitHub Issue for Topic Scope of Web Accessibility
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Comments:
> > Excellent work, very clear structure
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Unit 2: People and Digital Technology
> >
> > ----
> > Focus on unit 2 People and Digital Technology:
> >   * Do you agree with the introduction, learning outcomes, and
> > competences?
> >     * Do you think Learning Outcomes and Ideas for Assessment are 
> coherent
> > and feasible?
> >     * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach?
> >     * Do you have other thoughts, suggestions, or comments?
> > Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated
> >
> >
> >
> > Comments:
> > Excellent work, very clear structure
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Topic: Diverse Abilities, Tools, and Strategies
> >
> > ----
> > Focus on topic Diverse Abilities, Tools, and Strategies:
> >   * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes?
> >     * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework Ideas
> > are aligned?
> >     * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the 
> scope
> > of this topic?
> >     * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach?
> >     * Do you have further ideas or suggestions?
> > Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated
> > GitHub Issue for Topic Diverse Abilities, Tools, and Barriers
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Comments:
> > Excellent work, very clear structure
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Topic: Components of Web Accessibility
> >
> > ----
> > Focus on topic Components of Web Accessibility:
> >   * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes?
> >     * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework Ideas
> > are aligned?
> >     * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the 
> scope
> > of this topic?
> >     * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach?
> >     * Do you have further ideas or suggestions?
> > Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated
> > GitHub Issue for Topic Components of Web Accessibility
> >
> >
> >
> > Comments:
> > Excellent work, very clear structure
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Any other Thoughts/suggestions?
> >
> > ----
> > Any other thoughts or suggestions?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Comments:
> > Maybe I would include some more Suggested Teaching Resources because the
> > first two references are the same for both units.
> >
> > Also, maybe it would be good to add a self-evaluation of the course
> > materials.
> > Here is an example based on (Kneale et al. 2016 adapted by Krajcso 2018)
> > Questions:
> > Overall, I rate the module: 1 (very good)  2 3          4
> > 5 (very poor)
> > Overall, does the course/module help/support you to reach the declared
> > goals? Yes/ No/ I do not know
> > What do you like best about this course/module?
> > What would you like to change about the course/ module?
> > What suggestions do you have to improve the activities?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > These answers were last modified on 13 August 2019 at 23:00:02 U.T.C.
> > by Estella Oncins
> >
> >
> >
> > Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
> > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/unit12cr/ until 2019-08-13.
> >
> >   Regards,
> >
> >   The Automatic WBS Mailer
> >
> >


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus