Re: [wbs] response to 'WAI-Curricula: Thorough Review for units 1 and 2'

Hi Stella:


Many thanks for your comments and feedback.


Let me ask you something.



On 8/14/2019 1:03 AM, Estella Oncins via WBS Mailer wrote:
> The following answers have been successfully submitted to 'WAI-Curricula:
> Thorough Review for units 1 and 2' (Education and Outreach Working Group)
> for Estella Oncins.
>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Overview
>>
>> ----
>> Please read the complete drafts for Unit 1 and Unit 2. These are now
>> ready for thorough review.
>> Background: — To prepare for this questionnaire, you might want to have
>> a look at the following:
>>   * The WAI-Curricula Requirements Analysis page
>>     * July 12th minutes on WAI-Curricula
>> Thorough review! — Review everything at all levels, including
>> copy-editing. This is the "last call" before publication.
>> Feel free to comment in the below edit boxes or to open a New GitHub
>> Issue
>>
>> Note: The review versions linked above will not change during the review
>> period. Daniel will address some issues as they come in, so the live
>> draft might change during this review period. You might want to check
>> GitHub issues and the live updates before doing your review: Live draft -
>> Unit 1 and Live draft - Unit 2.
>>
> Comments:
> I think it would be good to differentiate between "competences" (in the
> previous version prerequisites) and "acquired competences" through learning
> process of the unit which now seems to be under "ideas for assessment".
> It is not clear the relation between the learning outcomes and the

It seems you wanted to say something else but the text is missing, right?


If so, feel free to Open a New Issue 
<https://github.com/w3c/wai-curricula/issues/new>

or send an email.
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Review level and timing
>>
>> ----
>> Please indicate below the level of consideration you were able to provide
>> for this review. If you were unable to get to it and would like more
>> time, please indicate that as well. Thanks!
>>
>>
>   * (x) I read the material carefully
> .
>   * ( ) I skimmed the material
>
>   * ( ) I need more time and have put a date below when I can get to it.
>   * ( ) I am not going to be able to review this material and will defer to
> the decisions of the group.
>   
>
>
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Unit 1: What is Web Accessibility
>>
>> ----
>> Focus on unit 1 What is Web Accessibility:
>>   * Do you agree with the introduction, learning outcomes, and
>> competences?
>>     * Do you think Learning Outcomes and Ideas for Assessment are coherent
>> and feasible?
>>     * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach?
>>     * Do you have other thoughts, suggestions, or comments?
>> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated
>> GitHub Issue for Unit 1
>>
> Comments:
> Minor error (I think), in Unit 1 under "Ideas for Assessment" the first
> point is "students" but then in the other points the term used is
> "learners".
> Maybe under "Ideas for Assessment" the same formula as in the "Learning
> Outcomes" section can be used  "Learners should be able to:" and indicate
> all the points.
>
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Topic: Stories of people with Disabilities
>>
>> ----
>> Focus on topic Stories of People with Disabilities:
>>   * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes?
>>     * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework Ideas
>> are aligned?
>>     * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the scope
>> of this topic?
>>     * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach?
>>     * Do you have further ideas or suggestions?
>> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated
>> GitHub Issue for Topic Stories of People with Disabilities
>>
> Comments:
> Excellent work, very clear structure
>
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Topic:  Scope of Web Accessibility
>>
>> ----
>> Focus on topic Scope of Web Accessibility:
>>   * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes?
>>     * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework Ideas
>> are aligned?
>>     * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the scope
>> of this topic?
>>     * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach?
>>     * Do you have further ideas or suggestions?
>> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated
>> GitHub Issue for Topic Scope of Web Accessibility
>>
>>
> Comments:
> Excellent work, very clear structure
>
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Unit 2: People and Digital Technology
>>
>> ----
>> Focus on unit 2 People and Digital Technology:
>>   * Do you agree with the introduction, learning outcomes, and
>> competences?
>>     * Do you think Learning Outcomes and Ideas for Assessment are coherent
>> and feasible?
>>     * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach?
>>     * Do you have other thoughts, suggestions, or comments?
>> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated
>>
> Comments:
> Excellent work, very clear structure
>
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Topic: Diverse Abilities, Tools, and Strategies
>>
>> ----
>> Focus on topic Diverse Abilities, Tools, and Strategies:
>>   * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes?
>>     * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework Ideas
>> are aligned?
>>     * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the scope
>> of this topic?
>>     * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach?
>>     * Do you have further ideas or suggestions?
>> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated
>> GitHub Issue for Topic Diverse Abilities, Tools, and Barriers
>>
>>
> Comments:
> Excellent work, very clear structure
>
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Topic: Components of Web Accessibility
>>
>> ----
>> Focus on topic Components of Web Accessibility:
>>   * Do you agree with the introduction and learning outcomes?
>>     * Do you think Learning Outcomes, Teaching Ideas, and Homework Ideas
>> are aligned?
>>     * Do you think Teaching Ideas and Homework Ideas cover well the scope
>> of this topic?
>>     * Do you agree with the wording, tone, and approach?
>>     * Do you have further ideas or suggestions?
>> Please feel free to comment in the below text box or open a dedicated
>> GitHub Issue for Topic Components of Web Accessibility
>>
> Comments:
> Excellent work, very clear structure
>
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>> Any other Thoughts/suggestions?
>>
>> ----
>> Any other thoughts or suggestions?
>>
>>
> Comments:
> Maybe I would include some more Suggested Teaching Resources because the
> first two references are the same for both units.
>
> Also, maybe it would be good to add a self-evaluation of the course
> materials.
> Here is an example based on (Kneale et al. 2016 adapted by Krajcso 2018)
> Questions:
> Overall, I rate the module: 1 (very good)  2          3          4
> 5 (very poor)
> Overall, does the course/module help/support you to reach the declared
> goals? Yes/ No/ I do not know
> What do you like best about this course/module?
> What would you like to change about the course/ module?
> What suggestions do you have to improve the activities?
>
>> These answers were last modified on 13 August 2019 at 23:00:02 U.T.C.
>> by Estella Oncins
>>
> Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/unit12cr/ until 2019-08-13.
>
>   Regards,
>
>   The Automatic WBS Mailer
>