Re: Selecting evaluation tools - Final (?) version

On 14/11/2017 15:59, Nic Steenhout wrote:
> Thanks Shadi,
> 
> Regarding #1, I'll adjust that. We need a heading, but your point does 
> make sense.
> 
> Regarding #3, it's in the EO style guide
> 
> Regarding #4, I'll move it up. As I wasn't able to simply merge your 
> pull request, I had to go through the file manually and obviously missed it.
> 
> Regarding #2, I'm honestly not seeing it, and I'm not sure how it is the 
> same underlying issue. But I'll have a look.

To me, several descriptions require me to first look at and understand 
the tools list before I can understand the descriptions. Usually these 
start with "lists ..." to describe the functionality of the tools list 
rather than the actual feature of a tool.


> I'll update #1, and #4 momentarily.

Let me know if you need more input on #2 after you've taken a look.

Best,
   Shadi


> Nic
> 
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org 
> <mailto:shadi@w3.org>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Nic,
> 
>     I only had time to do a quick skim, but many thanks for addressing
>     many of my concerns! Just a few things that caught my attention, though:
> 
>     - I still don't really like the heading "Features You Can Use as a
>     Filter". It just does not make sense to me on this page, if I'm not
>     aware of the tools list. It takes quite some mind work (eg read the
>     *prior* paragraph) to understand the context.
> 
>     - I find the tone and approach of the descriptions rather
>     inconsistent and confusing. Often you are describing the
>     functionality of the tools list rather than the actual tool feature
>     itself.
> 
>     - Not sure about use of "e.g." and "etc.". I don't like that style
>     (personal opinion), but don't know if it is covered in the EO guide.
> 
>     - "Accessibility Information" is actually a feature that you can
>     sort by. I had moved it up. Not sure if you disagree or just missed it.
> 
> 
>     Are these comments helpful for you, or do you prefer that I raise
>     them as issues or put them in another pull request?
> 
>     Best,
>        Shadi
> 
> 
> 
>     On 13/11/2017 21:05, Nic Steenhout wrote:
> 
>         Hello Shadi,
> 
>         Laura and I have, we think, finalized and incorporated the
>         changes you suggested to the Selecting evaluation tools page.
> 
>         https://github.com/w3c/wai-selecting-eval-tools/blob/master/index.md
>         <https://github.com/w3c/wai-selecting-eval-tools/blob/master/index.md>
> 
>         I had to rewrite the page manually as I was not able to merge
>         only parts of your pull request.
> 
>         We both like how the page is looking at the moment.
> 
>         Could you have a look and if things are good on your front,
>         we'll be able to initiate a request for review from the whole
>         group this Friday!
> 
>         Thank you
> 
>         Nic
> 
> 
>     -- 
>     Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
>     <http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/>
>     Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist
>     Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
>     World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
> 
> 

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/
Accessibility Strategy and Technology Specialist
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)

Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2017 15:09:18 UTC