- From: Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 13:07:19 +0200
- To: "Howard Kramer" <howard.kramer@colorado.edu>
- Cc: "Shawn Henry" <shawn@w3.org>, "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>, wai-eo-editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <837E991B-2AD7-4BFB-BF5A-F1DC2444C601@w3.org>
Shall I still create the GitHub repository, or shall I wait until we know what we want to do with the resource? On 15 Jul 2016, at 13:02, Howard Kramer wrote: > Shawn, > > > Your summary of Shadi's earlier remarks are not in sync with how I > read them. Maybe Shadi can clarify. > > > -Howard > > ________________________________ > From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2016 1:08:02 PM > To: Howard Kramer; Shadi Abou-Zahra > Cc: wai-eo-editors > Subject: Eval Report Template [was: [wbs] response to 'Resource > Management Survey'] > > Hi Howard & Shadi, > > Sorry, I totally missed this thread -- I cannot find it anywhere in my > e-mail. :( [1] > > Anyway, my understanding is that Shadi suggests that at the URI: > https://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/template.html > is either: > 1. a pointer to the report at > <https://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/report-tool/#/view_report> > or > 2. a copy of that report. > > However, I don't understand "add any missing bits, and update the > references to WCAG 2.0". > > ~Shawn > > > > > [1] > "" > Related messages: [ Next message ] [ Previous message ] [ In reply to > ] > From: Howard Kramer <howard.kramer@colorado.edu> > Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 21:20:58 +0000 > To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>, "team-eo-plan@w3.org" > <team-eo-plan@w3.org> > > Hi Shadi, > > I was a bit on the fence on whether this was still a necessary > resource. So the points you make seem very valid. I'd be glad to have > your help in updating the document. > > Regards, > Howard > > ________________________________________ > From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> > Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 12:35 PM > To: Howard Kramer; team-eo-plan@w3.org > Subject: Re: [wbs] response to 'Resource Management Survey' > > Hi Howard, > > On 7.4.2016 04:12, Howard Kramer via WBS Mailer wrote: >> The WCAG EM report tool seems make this resource (Template for >> Accessibility Evaluation Reports) outdated & redundant. If updated it >> could >> still be a useful resource but not sure there's a need for it with >> the new >> EM report tool. Numerous references to WCAG 1.0 and related technical >> documents. All these references and links need to be updated. I'm not >> sure >> this document is still needed. Some things I liked about it - such as >> being >> able to review all the report sections at once. > > Actually I think this is still very useful and relevant. For example, > I > was recently in a meeting where they were discussing a common > reporting > format for all public websites in Europe so that they can be > monitored. > It occurred to me that only very few people know how to go directly to > the "view report" step of the report tool to get a template report > (and > even then, things like "executive summary" are missing from that > view). > Many - especially non-technical people - might not start fiddling with > tools to see if it can generate a report template, not matter how > clear > we make it in the instructions for the tool... > > Anyway, I think this could be a very very simple thing (and hopefully > I > didn't jinx it now) - basically copy and paste the "view report" stuff > from the report tool, add any missing bits, and update the references > to > WCAG 2.0. I would be happy to help you! > > Best, > Shadi > "" -- Eric Eggert Web Accessibility Specialist Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) at World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Friday, 15 July 2016 11:07:33 UTC