- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:59:56 +0100
- To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
- CC: EO Editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org>, BAD TF <public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org>
Dear EOWG, Please find below a proposed disposition of the most recent comments on the Before and After Demo (BAD) for your review: Comment #1: add WAI-ARIA landmarks [1,2] Resolution: reject Rationale: out of scope for this version; on the wishlist for future [1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2011OctDec/0096> [2] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2011OctDec/0098> Comment #2: (1.1) add skip link to site navigation [3] Resolution: reject - skip links improved elsewhere (see comment #11) Rationale: it is ~2 tabs from the skip link to the site navigation [3] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2011OctDec/0099> Comment #3: (1.2) keep focus on page change [3] Resolution: reject Rationale: page is reloaded (rather than dynamically generated) [3] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2011OctDec/0099> Comment #4: (1.3) focus indicator on sub-menu is not distinguishable [3] Resolution: accept - fix bug (there should be icons appearing) Rationale: this was the initial design but there is a bug in the CSS [3] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2011OctDec/0099> Comment #5: (2.1) markup tab structure as tabs (using WAI-ARIA) rather than as a list [3] Resolution: reject Rationale: in this case a list is sufficiently similar user experience to tabs, and WAI-ARIA is not well supported [3] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2011OctDec/0099> Comment #6: (1) tone down white on red highlighting for links [4] Resolution: reject Rationale: it meets WCAG requirements and would be a big design change [4] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2011OctDec/0102> Comment #7: (2) tone up highlighting for form controls [4] Resolution: accept - form controls now have same highlighting as links Rationale: controls should be consistent with styling for links [4] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2011OctDec/0102> Comment #8: (1) communicate change when annotations are activated [5] Resolution: accept - "Annotations" now in the title and first heading Rationale: because the page is reloaded the change is communicated [5] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2011OctDec/0105> Comment #9: (2) markup tab structure as tabs (using WAI-ARIA) rather than as a list (see also comment #5) [5] Resolution: reject Rationale: in this case a list is sufficiently similar user experience to tabs, and WAI-ARIA is not well supported [5] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2011OctDec/0105> Comment #9: (2a) keep focus on page change (see also comment #3) [5] Resolution: reject Rationale: page is reloaded (rather than dynamically generated) [5] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2011OctDec/0105> Comment #10: (3) list items not exposed properly in Firefox [5] Resolution: pending - looking into it Rationale: cannot replicate the issue on my setup [5] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2011OctDec/0105> Comment #11: (4) skip links are confusing [5] Resolution: accept - revised skip links Rationale: skip link texts were not worded consistently [5] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2011OctDec/0105> Comment #12: add example of accessible CAPTCHA [6] Resolution: reject Rationale: out of scope for this version; on the wishlist for future [6] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2011OctDec/0107> Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ Activity Lead, W3C/WAI International Program Office Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group (ERT WG) Research and Development Working Group (RDWG)
Received on Friday, 6 January 2012 13:00:26 UTC