Re: Structure for training resource page

Hi Andrew,

I like the order you propose ("key points" first right below "speaker 
notes"). However, I think the "Ways to engage audience" is a little too 
broad and vague (note that Sharron had "questions" initially). Also the 
"Demonstration ideas" and "Activity ideas" are a little unclear and may 
better be something like "Related demonstrations" or such. Finally, I'm 
not sure if some of the demonstration stuff belongs under "Resources" 
like the "Handouts", rather than under "speaker notes".

Anyway, these are just for your consideration while you work through 
each of the topics and sort out the actual content beneath each of the 
headings. Happy tersification! ;)

Best,
   Shadi


Andrew Arch wrote:
> Sharron,
> 
> I took at a pass at the re-structure on the bottom of:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/training/2009/topics.html
> 
> I thought Demonstrations was also to be a sub-part of Speakers' Notes
> 
> But not sure if I got it right.
> 
> Shawn - your action seemed to be cut short in the minutes:
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/05-eo-minutes.html#action05
> 
> Andrew
> 
> Sharron Rush wrote:
>>
>> Andrew, Shadi, Shawn...
>> Is this the correct structure to use?
>>
>> *Goal
>> *To raise awareness and skill for advocating and implementing 
>> accessibility practice
>>
>> *Audience
>> *The general public
>>
>> *Description
>> *This topic is provided as an introduction to ...
>>
>> *What the audience will learn*
>>
>>     * understanding of...
>>     * how to...
>>     * where to get more information
>> *Demonstrations/Activities*
>>
>>     * assistive tech demo
>>     * hands-on this or that
>>     * next
>>     * next
>>     * next
>> *Resources*
>>
>>     * slides
>>     * papers
>>     * research
>> *Additional Resources*
>>
>>     * resource
>>     * resource
>>     * etc* *
>>
>> *Handouts*
>>
>>     * blah blah* *
>>
>> *Speaker Notes *
>>
>>     *Key points to make*     1. point 1     2. point 2     3. point 3
>>
>>     *Questions to engage the audience*     1. Q1     2.Q2     3. etc
>> Upon approval, I will modify the Topic Outline Structure to reflect 
>> that....
>>
>> <!--
>>   <h2>Topic Outline Structure</h2>
>>   <h3>Goal</h3>
>>   <p class="listwithp">@@</p>
>>   <h3>Audience</h3>
>>   <p class="listwithp">@@</p>
>>   <h3>Description</h3>
>>   <p class="listwithp">@@</p>
>>   <h3>What the audience will learn</h3>
>>   <ul class="listwithp">
>>     <li>@@</li>
>>   </ul>
>>     <h3>Demonstrations/Exercises/Activities</h3>
>>   <ul class="listwithp">
>>     <li>@@</li>
>>   </ul>
>>   <h3>Resources</h3>
>>   <ul class="listwithp">
>>     <li>@@</li>
>>   </ul>
>>   <h4 class="listintro">Additional resources:</h4>
>>   <ul class="listwithp">
>>     <li>@@</li>
>>   </ul>
>>   <h4 class="listintro">Handouts:</h4>
>>   <ul class="listwithp">
>>     <li>@@</li>
>>   </ul>
>> <h3>Speaker Notes</h3>
>>   <ul class="listwithp">
>>     <li>@@</li>
>>   </ul>
>>
>>   <p class="totop"><a href="#toc">back to topics list</a></p>
>> --> 
> 
> 

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |

Received on Friday, 5 February 2010 17:46:44 UTC