- From: WBS Mailer on behalf of <andrew.arch@nils.org.au>
- Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 04:17:01 +0000
- To: andrew.arch@nils.org.au,wai-eo-editors@w3.org
Here are the answers submitted to 'EOWG Call for Review: Improving the Accessibility of Your Web Site, 2006 March' (Education and Outreach Working Group) for Andrew Arch. --------------------------------- Support for Improving the Accessibility of Your Web Site ---- * ( ) I accept this version of the document as is * (x) I accept this version of the document, and suggest changes below * ( ) I accept this version of the document only with the changes below * ( ) I do not accept this version of the document because of the comments below * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Comments ---- Comments on the document, formatted as described above. priority: [editor's discretion] location: Optimising Process suggested revision: incorporate the H4 headings into the paragraphs Rationale: readability & scanability priority: [editor's discretion] location: Optimising Tools suggested revision: Drop H3 and make new H3s - Optimising Authoring Tools & Optimising Eval and Repair Tools Rationale: readability and scanability priority: [editor's discretion] or [list for next version] location: Prioritizing the Repairs suggested revision: We need to add something about the fact that there is no point in addressing issues on individual pages if the target activity is not kept in mind. If there is still a key page on a critical activity pathway that cannot be completed, then most of the effort in fixing related pages is wasted. We don't seem to make this point strongly/clearly enough These answers were last modified on 17 March 2006 at 04:11:44 U.T.C. by Andrew Arch Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/retro1-2006/ until 2006-03-16. Regards, The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Friday, 17 March 2006 04:17:10 UTC