- From: WBS Mailer on behalf of <andrew.arch@nils.org.au>
- Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 04:02:01 +0000
- To: andrew.arch@nils.org.au,wai-eo-editors@w3.org
Here are the answers submitted to 'EOWG Call for Review: Using Combined Expertise to Evaluate Web Accessibility' (Education and Outreach Working Group) for Andrew Arch. --------------------------------- Using Combined Expertise to Evaluate Web Accessibility ---- * ( ) I accept this version of the document as is * (x) I accept this version of the document, and suggest changes below * ( ) I accept this version of the document only with the changes below * ( ) I do not accept this version of the document because of the comments below * ( ) I abstain (not vote) --------------------------------- Comments ---- Comments on the document, formatted as described above. Comments (or a URI pointing to your comments): priority: [required for this version] location: Appendix current wording: link from "Evaluation Tools for Web Accessibility" suggested revision: needs to link to the revised Eval Tools Overview page rationale: Document needs to be up-to-date priority: [editor's discretion] location: "Approaches ..." [several places] current wording: relying on outside experts suggested revision: relying on external experts rationale: clarity priority: [editor's discretion] location: Recommended Expertise current wording: "Effective evaluation of Web accessibility requires more than simply running an evaluation tool over a Web site." suggested revision: "Effective evaluation of Web accessibility requires more than simply getting a report frm an evaluation tool." priority: [editor's discretion] location: Recommended expertise current wording: "The following list includes recommended expertise across a variety of areas" suggested revision: "The following list includes areas of expertise that will improve the evaluation" priority: [editor's discretion] location: Communicating Results current wording: "Collaborative teams may want to give particular attention" suggested revision: "Collaborative teams will want to give particular attention" priority: [editor's discretion] location: Communicating Results current wording: "represent the combined perspectives of different evaluators" suggested revision: "represent the combined perspectives of evaluators with different skills and experience" priority: [editor's discretion] or [list for next version] location: Getting and giving feedback suggested revision: add a note about the importance of getting feedback from other users of the site and having the person/team consider this as a valid augmentation of their own expertise. Users providing feedbak can also add real value to improvement process. These answers were last modified on 17 March 2006 at 03:59:22 U.T.C. by Andrew Arch Answers to this questionnaire can be set and changed at http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35532/expertise-2006/ until 2006-03-18. Regards, The Automatic WBS Mailer
Received on Friday, 17 March 2006 04:02:12 UTC