- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 1997 18:21:05 -0400 (EDT)
- To: w3c-wai-wg@w3.org (WAI Working Group)
Jason White knows enough to do us some good, here. I am not going to try to recapitulate what he has said of his available level of effort, but it's non-zero. We should spend it wisely. At the moment, I am interested in having examples, even style-sheet fragments, available. Not necessarily a global encyclopaedia of Braille styles. In particular, I would like an established legacy dialect of Braille as the target, so as to represent what is fairly established practice. In other words, I would be glad to take whatever Jason knows best. I want to have concrete examples of the kinds of collapsing transforms that go into a data-compression scheme like this. What I remember are the compression of indents and the _selective_ pass-through of italics. CSS examples for this established Braille practice would bring home the moral: - for CSS to work the accessibility problem, the class system over which the styles are layered has to have some semantic depth, not just be a 1-1 precursor for visual font effects. In general, we are going to have to develop downgrading-by-rule recommended practices for taking documents that have been authored with no thought to any browse mode but the wizziest, and mapping them into less-inflected media in a comprehensible way. I want some examples around to make it clear what kind of a beast that downgrading filter is. -- Al Gilman PS: I have added a few unvarnished comments on the ACSS note alongside the action item response in http://www.access.digex.net/%7Easgilman/web-access/ Most of them have nothing to do with accessibility. Please take them with more than one grain of salt.
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 1997 18:21:07 UTC