Re: proposal for responses to 20 March 2015 Comments - SH01

It may be just me, but I'm again finding it difficult to follow the thread through these nested responses. For example, you say we "decline the second change" and explain "UAWG's opinion is that the need to turn the text style on or off globally is a rare, but necessary use case.  Customizing text on an element level does not require that global ability.  UAWG chose the phrasing deliberately." Which phrasing are you referring to? The explanation seem to imply that she's either asking for global settings to be removed (your first sentence) or local settings to be added (your second); I can't tell which you're declining, but in my reading of her comments I don't see her asking for either. Are you referring to where she quotes bullet items for 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 and asked "Should these be the same or is there a reason that they are different?" I read that as merely questioning why the wordings differed, with the implied suggestion that we normalize them if the difference was 
unintentional, rather than suggesting we remove any requirements. (Those are in her second "SLH" response to your first response to her SH01, showing how confusing these nested responses get.) My apologies if I'm totally misreading this.

     Thanks,
     Greg

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: proposal for responses to 20 March 2015 Comments - SH01
From: Jeanne Spellman <jeanne@w3.org>
To: UAWG <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Date: 3/27/2015 10:11 AM
> We received new comments in response to our request to close out the prior comments.
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2015JanMar/0055.html
>
> Kim moved the key parts of the email to a wiki page:
> https://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/work/wiki/Comment_Response_20_March_2015
>
> I propose the following changes  in response to SH01:
> SH01 response has 2 parts.
> 1) I propose to change Line Spacing so that the text matches in both places.
>     "* Line spacing, choosing from a range with at least three values up to at least 2 times the default"
> I propose to decline the second change and respond:
> "UAWG 's opinion is that the need to turn the text style on or off globally is a rare, but necessary use case.  Customizing text on an element level does not require that global ability.  UAWG chose the phrasing deliberately.  "
>
> 2) I propose accepting the change as suggested: Change "When it comes to magnification, size, or spacing, the optimum value for a given user would vary based on their visual impairment..." TO:
> "Users have varying needs for text size and spacing"
>
>