- From: Markku Hakkinen <mhakkinen@acm.org>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 12:22:32 -0400
- To: Greg Lowney <gcl-0039@access-research.org>
- Cc: UAWG list <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Hi Greg, I wanted to capture the ARIA issue for structured nav, so made a modification to the wiki, adding "or role": The user has the option to configure the set of important elements for structured navigation, including by element type or role (e.g., headers, list items, images). (Level AAA) mark On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Greg Lowney <gcl-0039@access-research.org> wrote: > Good question, Jan! I can see that we didn't make it very clear. > > Of the seven success criteria Guideline 2.7, titled "Structural Navigation", > three were about direct, rather than structural, navigation and activation > so we proposed moving them to a new Guideline 2.3, titled "Direct Navigation > and Activation". Of those remaining, three didn't seem to be about keyboard > or navigation, so we didn't address them. > > Here's the proposed disposition of the success criteria in 2.7: > > 2.7.1 Discover navigation and activation keystrokes, is about direct > navigation/activation so becomes 2.3.3 and 2.3.4. > > 2.7.2 Access Relationships, did not seem to be about keyboard or navigation > and so was not addressed in our proposal. > > 2.7.3 Location in Hierarchy, did not seem to be about keyboard or navigation > and so was not addressed in our proposal. As we were discussing last week, > if it's about navigation then it belongs under > > 2.7.4 Direct navigation, is about direct navigation/activation so becomes > 2.3.1. > > 2.7.5 Access to Relationships which Aid Navigation, did not seem to be about > keyboard or navigation and so was not addressed in our proposal. > > 2.7.6 Direct activation, is about direct navigation/activation so becomes > 2.3.2. > > 2.7.7 Configure Set of Important Elements (for structural navigation), > should have been included in our reorganization at the end of Guideline 2.5 > "Provide Structured Navigation". I putting it there now, along with a > placeholder for a new SC that would actually require structural navigation, > as we were requiring it to be configurable, but not to be provided in the > first place. > > I've put this information into the Major Changes section of the Wiki > article. > > Thanks, > Greg > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: Meeting: User Agent Teleconference for 21 April 2011 > From: Richards, Jan <jrichards@ocad.ca> > To: UAWG list <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org> > Date: 4/19/2011 6:33 PM > > I think I’m a little fuzzy on what Greg and Kim propose to do with SCs > 2.7.3-2.7.7 (the ones Simon provided wording for) because some appear in the > proposal and some do not. Could we get some clarification? > > > > Cheers, > > Jan > > > > -- > > (Mr) Jan Richards, M.Sc. > > jrichards@ocad.ca | 416-977-6000 ext. 3957 | fax: 416-977-9844 > > Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) | http://idrc.ocad.ca/ > > Faculty of Design | OCAD University > > > > From: w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org] On Behalf > Of Kelly Ford > Sent: April 19, 2011 6:41 PM > To: UAWG list > Subject: Meeting: User Agent Teleconference for 21 April 2011 > > > > Meeting: User Agent Teleconference for 21 April 2011 > > Date: Thursday, 21 April 2011 > > Time: User Agent Working Group will begin the call at 1pm Boston Local > Time, (18:00-19:30 UTC/GMT) > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html > > Call-in: Zakim bridge at: +1-617-761-6200, for UK use +44.203.318.0479 > (London), for SIP phone call Zakim via zakim@voip.w3.org > > Code: 82941# (UAWG1#) > > > > IRC: server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665, channel: #ua. > > Chair: Jim Allan, Kelly Ford > > > > Important: In preparation for this week's meeting, please try and have > reviewed all the links here and messages on these topics sent to the list. > We started talking about several of these last week and would like to try > and close out these proposals to the point of putting text in the documents > since people have worked so long on these items. > > > > Agenda+Proposals from Simon, please see: > > 2.7.3 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2011JanMar/0090.html > > 2.7.4 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2011JanMar/0095.html > > 2.7.5 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2011JanMar/0092.html > > 2.7.6 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2011JanMar/0094.html > > 2.7.7 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2011JanMar/0096.html > > > > Agenda+ review Greg & Kim Proposal > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2011AprJun/0006.html > > > > Agenda+Action Item Review > > > > Links to key Documents: > > > > WIKI: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/work/wiki/ > > > > Editor versions > > Guidelines: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2011/ED-UAAG20-20110202/ > > Implementing: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2011/ED-IMPLEMENTING-UAAG20-20110202/ > > > > -- Please monitor your open Action Items: > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/tracker/actions/open > > > > -- Open Issues: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/tracker/issues/open s updated > documents > > >
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2011 16:23:06 UTC