- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:25:00 -0400
- To: ishida@w3.org
- CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Richard Ishida wrote: > Hi Ian, > > I have forwarded your responses to the i18n group comments to the i18n group for review. Thankyou. > > I wanted to come back on the following: > > >> > #ri-1: >> > Sec 2, 1st bulleted list >> > It would be useful to clarify the intent and normative status of >>the bold text that immediately follows a guideline title. >> >>See the beginning of section 2, which gives a succinct >>explanation of the normative and informative parts of each >>checkpoint definition. >> >>"Each checkpoint definition includes the following parts. Some parts >>are normative (i.e., relate to conformance); others are informative >>only. ..." > > > I was actually referring to the text related to guidelines, not checkpoints. >The first bulleted list in ch2 mentions the guideline number and guideline title >(which I assume are both inside the box), but then goes on to the rationale without >mentioning the intervening bold text (eg. From Guideline 1: "Ensure that the user >can interact with the user agent (and the content it renders) through different > input and output devices.") It is this bold text I am querying. Ok, thanks for the clarification. Yes, I can indicate that that's informative as well. Thanks Richard, _ Ian -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Monday, 30 September 2002 11:25:02 UTC