- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:13:57 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
UAWG teleconference 14 Feb 2002 Agenda announcement: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002JanMar/0054 Participants: Jon Gunderson (Chair), Ian Jacobs (Scribe) Tim Lacy, David Poehlman, Rich Schwerdtfeger, Harvey Bingham Regrets: Lee Bateman, Jim Allan, Denis Anson Previous meeting: 24 January 2002 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002JanMar/0038 Next meeting: 21 Feb Reference document 12 September Candidate Recommendation: http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/CR-UAAG10-20010912/ ========== Discussion ========== -------------------- 1. Status report on evaluations. -------------------- * IJ working on Opera evaluation. * DP working on evaluation of IE6 with Jaws 4.01 on Windows XP JG: This will help us with access keys and navigation to headers. * IJ awaiting Netscape evaluation results. * JG not much progress on IE 6 evaluation. * IJ no news from Apple (Quicktime) and Mac IE, though I have reason to believe we may get reports from them. Action IJ: Ping Judy about Macromedia review. -------------------- 2. Charter update -------------------- Revised charter: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/charter-20011218 See "Current Patent Practice" http://www.w3.org/TR/patent-practice TL: I can't make any statement in favor or not. But I've sent the heads-up to the legal department. I expect I will get an answer back this afternoon. IJ: I will not send to the AC until I hear back. RS: I need to talk to the AC rep about this. JG, DP, HB: I am ok with new IPR provision. Action RS and TL: Let Ian know whether IBM and MS, respectively, approve change to charter. Deadline 21 Feb 2002. /* HB joins, gives nod to new IPR section */ --------------------------------- 3. Implementation report update --------------------------------- JG: Added WMP and Grins player evaluations. See revised report: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/implementation/report-cr2-checkpoint-summary JG: Please do evaluations in terms of checkpoints not yet implemented. IJ: Comment on implementation report: move summary table and yet-unimplemented checkpoints to the home page (rather than the summary page). /* TL leaves */ RS: Please include version information in supported format information. JG: What helps in the reviews is when people write down support for the specific accessibility features. More detail is much more helpful. --------------------------------- 4. UAAG 1.0 v. 508 Comparision --------------------------------- Refer to IJ and JG comparison: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2002/02/uaag10-508 JG: Conclusion: The two documents are quite different. IJ: I think that WAI IPO will be following up on 508-related stuff, so that UAWG's job should be considered done for now. If they need us, they can call us. DP: Section 508 accessibility forum is looking to compare and contrast various guidelines. Can this comparison be used outside of the UAWG context? IJ: This is a public document. Feel free to show it to people, but please emphasize its draft status. Also, if you want to organize a joint teleconf, that might be good. JG: Sure. DP: A couple of possibilities: inviting people to our teleconf, or having a seminar. --------------------------------- 5. Test suites --------------------------------- JG: I have some students starting to work on test suites. A preliminary set of test suite requirements is available: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/TS/reqs-20020208 Action IJ: Forward this link to the QA Working Group. --------------------------------- 6. Where we are --------------------------------- RS: Do we have a deadline at which point we will stop gathering evaluations and make choices on moving forward? IJ: I'd like to wait at least four weeks for incoming evaluations, then meet and discuss next steps. JG: We need to focus on what we don't have implementation for, not just getting more evaluations. Next meetings: * 21 February (expect to finalize charter, look at more reviews) * 28 Feb, 7 Mar no meetings * 14 March: Discuss where we are and next steps. * 21 March canceled (CSUN) * 28 March (Regrets: DP) ================= Open action items ================= HB: Contact ION Systems for a review of their e-reader with UAAG guidelines Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001OctDec/0082 HB: I will ping Jill Thomas (jill@ionsystems.com). Pinged Tom yesterday. DP: When I last talked to Jill a couple of months ago, she said that Tom was the appropriate contact. ================= Closed action items ================= RS: Follow up on IBM software that might contribute to list of implementations. IJ: I will followup offline. Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001OctDec/0135 DOM WG: See summary by Charles: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002JanMar/0056 "Ray made a proposal. UA and PF need to review it and see if it makes sense and we would like this. THen we ask DOM and whoever else is relevant to accept the proposal, and then we get something from them to review." IJ: The DOM 3 Events spec has been revised: http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-DOM-Level-3-Events-20020208 "Interface EventTarget The Event interface has one new attribute: eventListenerList." ================= Dropped action items ================= UAAGWG: Review Ray's proposal related to DOM API to access descriptions of event listeners IJ: This is in PF's court now. -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260-9447
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2002 15:17:37 UTC