- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 20:02:23 -0500
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- CC: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>, User Agent Working group list <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
Al Gilman wrote: > > At 05:40 PM 2001-01-05 -0500, Ian Jacobs wrote: > >I vote for "motionless, unblinking text". > > > > AG:: and, _mutandus mutandi_, "motionless, unblinking images" in 3.4? Yep, already done locally... - Ian > > - Ian > > > > > >Al Gilman wrote: > >> > >> At 10:24 AM 2001-01-04 -0500, David Poehlman wrote: > >> >below are two checkpoints with the word motionless in them. I know > >> >I've seen them before but it occurred to me that blinking is not > >> >actually motion and that for both, perhaps the word static would be > >> >better than motionless? > >> > > >> > 3.3 Allow the user to configure the user agent to render animated > >> >or > >> > blinking text as motionless text. [Priority 1] > >> > Content type labels: VisualText. > >> > Techniques for checkpoint 3.3 > >> > > >> > 3.4 Allow the user to configure the user agent to render blinking > >> > images as motionless images. [Priority 1] > >> > Content type labels: Color, Animation. > >> > Techniques for checkpoint 3.4 > >> > > >> > >> AG:: > >> > >> Good point. On the other hand, 'static' risks confusion with issues of > >> dynamic > >> content. > >> > >> Other terms that might work here: unchanging, frozen, unblinking, "an > >> unchanging display." > >> > >> Al > >> > >> >Hands-On Technolog(eye)s > >> >touching the internet > >> > ><<mailto:poehlman1@home.com>mailto:poehlman1@home.com><mailto:poehlman1@hom > e.com>mailto:poehlman1@home.com > >> >voice: 301.949.7599 > >> >---end sig--- > >> > > > > >-- > >Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) > <http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs>http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > >Tel: +1 831 457-2842 > >Cell: +1 917 450-8783 > > -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 831 457-2842 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Friday, 5 January 2001 20:04:18 UTC