Re: motionless?

Sounds good to me.

Jon


At 05:40 PM 1/5/2001 -0500, Ian Jacobs wrote:
>I vote for "motionless, unblinking text".
>
>  - Ian
>
>
>Al Gilman wrote:
> >
> > At 10:24 AM 2001-01-04 -0500, David Poehlman wrote:
> > >below are two checkpoints with the word motionless in them.  I know
> > >I've seen them before but it occurred to me that blinking is not
> > >actually motion and that for both, perhaps the word static would be
> > >better than motionless?
> > >
> > >   3.3 Allow the user to configure the user agent to render animated
> > >or
> > >          blinking text as motionless text. [Priority 1]
> > >          Content type labels: VisualText.
> > >          Techniques for checkpoint 3.3
> > >
> > >   3.4 Allow the user to configure the user agent to render blinking
> > >          images as motionless images. [Priority 1]
> > >          Content type labels: Color, Animation.
> > >          Techniques for checkpoint 3.4
> > >
> >
> > AG::
> >
> > Good point.  On the other hand, 'static' risks confusion with issues of
> > dynamic
> > content.
> >
> > Other terms that might work here:  unchanging, frozen, unblinking, "an
> > unchanging display."
> >
> > Al
> >
> > >Hands-On Technolog(eye)s
> > >touching the internet
> > ><mailto:poehlman1@home.com>mailto:poehlman1@home.com
> > >voice: 301.949.7599
> > >---end sig---
> > >
>
>--
>Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
>Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
>Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783

Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
MC-574
College of Applied Life Studies
University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL  61820

Voice: (217) 244-5870
Fax: (217) 333-0248

E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu

WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua

Received on Monday, 8 January 2001 09:15:29 UTC