- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 19:52:33 -0500
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>, User Agent Working group list <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>
At 05:40 PM 2001-01-05 -0500, Ian Jacobs wrote: >I vote for "motionless, unblinking text". > AG:: and, _mutandus mutandi_, "motionless, unblinking images" in 3.4? > - Ian > > >Al Gilman wrote: >> >> At 10:24 AM 2001-01-04 -0500, David Poehlman wrote: >> >below are two checkpoints with the word motionless in them. I know >> >I've seen them before but it occurred to me that blinking is not >> >actually motion and that for both, perhaps the word static would be >> >better than motionless? >> > >> > 3.3 Allow the user to configure the user agent to render animated >> >or >> > blinking text as motionless text. [Priority 1] >> > Content type labels: VisualText. >> > Techniques for checkpoint 3.3 >> > >> > 3.4 Allow the user to configure the user agent to render blinking >> > images as motionless images. [Priority 1] >> > Content type labels: Color, Animation. >> > Techniques for checkpoint 3.4 >> > >> >> AG:: >> >> Good point. On the other hand, 'static' risks confusion with issues of >> dynamic >> content. >> >> Other terms that might work here: unchanging, frozen, unblinking, "an >> unchanging display." >> >> Al >> >> >Hands-On Technolog(eye)s >> >touching the internet >> ><<mailto:poehlman1@home.com>mailto:poehlman1@home.com><mailto:poehlman1@hom e.com>mailto:poehlman1@home.com >> >voice: 301.949.7599 >> >---end sig--- >> > > >-- >Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) <http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs>http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs >Tel: +1 831 457-2842 >Cell: +1 917 450-8783 >
Received on Friday, 5 January 2001 19:46:55 UTC