- From: Hansen, Eric <ehansen@ets.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 14:35:47 -0500
- To: "'Al Gilman'" <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
I have a similar concern as Al on this point. > -----Original Message----- > From: Al Gilman [mailto:asgilman@iamdigex.net] > Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2000 2:13 PM > To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org > Subject: Re: Proposal for modifying checkpoint 4.17 (Issue 405) > > > At 12:11 PM 2000-12-13 -0600, Jon Gunderson wrote: > > > >2. Focus style should have priority over selection style. > No mixing, just > >priority. > > > > Please note my concern on this point. The UA should be > allowed or encouraged > to mix them if it can. The priority should only be an issue > if it can't. The > CSS algorithm (pick one style) is bad human engineering in > this situation. > Lots of the relevant screen effects mix fine. > > I think that my input on this point is consistent with what > Greg Lowney said. > Greg says that the default focus and selection styles should > be mixable and be > mixed when something is both focused and selected. That is a > good idea. We > don't necessarily have to make it a requirement, but we sure > shouldn't make it > disallowed. > > It's one thing to say that the UA is not required to mix them > and when it > can't > it should use the focus style. It's another to say that the > UA should not mix > them but just use the focus style. To me the latter is > writing rules that > degrade the communication effectiveness of the tool, which is > not our goal, > last I checked. > > Al >
Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2000 14:36:20 UTC