Re: Refinements and additions to minimum set of functions for single command checkpoint (bookmarks/favorites )

>
>I just want to note that we have no requirement on the
>user agent to implement a bookmarks feature. Having a P1 requirement
>to provide single command access to such a feature is problematic
>for me. Unless we add a P1 requirement to implement such a feature.
>Most of the other bindings in the proposed list have corresponding
>checkpoints (e.g., navigation of active elements).
>
>So, I think we need to make the requirement explicit
>in order to determine the appropriate priority level. I don't think
>that single command access to a P2 required functionality should
>be P1.
>
>  - Ian

JRG: Checkpoint 10.5 is currently a P2 requirement.  I don't understand 
what functionality you are referring to as a P1 requirement.  Could you 
explain?

Thanks,
Jon


>--
>Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
>Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
>Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783

Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP
Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology
Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services
MC-574
College of Applied Life Studies
University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign
1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL  61820

Voice: (217) 244-5870
Fax: (217) 333-0248

E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu

WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund
WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua

Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2000 09:14:34 UTC