- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 22:26:00 -0400
- To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
- CC: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Jon Gunderson wrote:
>
> How about this then:
>
> <NEW1>
> 2.3 If content available in a viewport has equivalent alternatives, provide
> access to the alternative equivalents by either substituting the
> alternative equivalent for the primary content, rendering the alternative
> as part of the primary content (both at the same time) or providing a link
> to the alternative equivalent from the primary content.
> <NEW1>
I'm almost ok with that. I still think that we need to allow
the user agent developer to provide access through the UI
rather than in content. Here's a shot:
<NEW_UI>
2.3 If content available in a viewport has equivalent alternatives,
provide easy access to the alternative equivalents
through at least one of the following mechanisms:
- Allowing configuration to render alternative
instead of primary content.
- Allowing configuration to render alternative in addition to
primary content.
- Providing a direct link to the alternative in content,
just before or after the primary content.
- Allowing the user to select the primary content and then
inspect its alternatives.
<NEW_UI>
Notes:
1) I put back the word "easy" since that helps understand the
rationale.
2) I hesitate to put four techniques in a checkpoint, but if
implementing any one of them would mean that the UA met the
requirement, then I'm ok with that level of specificity.
- Ian
--
Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel: +1 831 457-2842
Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Monday, 24 July 2000 22:26:10 UTC