- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 22:26:00 -0400
- To: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
- CC: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Jon Gunderson wrote: > > How about this then: > > <NEW1> > 2.3 If content available in a viewport has equivalent alternatives, provide > access to the alternative equivalents by either substituting the > alternative equivalent for the primary content, rendering the alternative > as part of the primary content (both at the same time) or providing a link > to the alternative equivalent from the primary content. > <NEW1> I'm almost ok with that. I still think that we need to allow the user agent developer to provide access through the UI rather than in content. Here's a shot: <NEW_UI> 2.3 If content available in a viewport has equivalent alternatives, provide easy access to the alternative equivalents through at least one of the following mechanisms: - Allowing configuration to render alternative instead of primary content. - Allowing configuration to render alternative in addition to primary content. - Providing a direct link to the alternative in content, just before or after the primary content. - Allowing the user to select the primary content and then inspect its alternatives. <NEW_UI> Notes: 1) I put back the word "easy" since that helps understand the rationale. 2) I hesitate to put four techniques in a checkpoint, but if implementing any one of them would mean that the UA met the requirement, then I'm ok with that level of specificity. - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 831 457-2842 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Monday, 24 July 2000 22:26:10 UTC