- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 11:48:49 -0400
- To: Eric and Jennifer <jenniferanderic@email.msn.com>
- CC: jongund@uiuc.edu, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org, ehansen@ets.org
Eric and Jennifer wrote: > > I am unable to attend the telecon today. I also have a couple of > suggestions. Hi Eric (assuming this is Eric - the email isn't signed), Thanks for sending regrets. > 2. I think that we need a new working draft of the document, at least of the > sections that we have worked on. I find that there is too much to remember > the context and it is hard to comment in an efficient manner. I will publish a new document tomorrow with whatever has changed since 7 May. That may not be much. In particular, none of the minimal requirements discussions will be captured there. That information is being stored for now in the minimal reqs document [1] linked from the WAI UA home page. - Ian [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2000/05/ua-minreqs > 1. It would be helpful if people would provide more context for their > comments. I think that it is very helpful when people show explicitly how > the comment would impact the language of the guidelines. For example one can > say: > > <Old checkpoint Z.Z (7 May version)> > xx xxxx x x > </Old checkpoint Z.Z (7 May version)> > > <New checkpoint Z.Z> > xx xxxxss x x > </New checkpoint Z.Z> Yes, I agree. If you don't indicate the version of the document and the checkpoint numbers change, it's very hard to look back at the record and understand what the context is. - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 831 457-2842 Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2000 11:48:56 UTC