- From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 12:32:54 -0500
- To: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org, w3c-wai-pf@w3.org
Ian, Response in JRG: At 12:03 PM 5/1/00 -0400, Ian Jacobs wrote: >Jon Gunderson wrote: > > > > Responses in JRG: > > > > > > 3. All views need to be accessible > > > > > >IJ: I don't think this is true. Some views could not be accessible, > > >as long as the user can get equivalent functionality in other views. > > >Just like for the documentation: some documentation may be inaccessible > > >as long as at least one version is. > > > > JRG: I think saying that all views do not need to be accessible is > > problematic. A developer could say that the source view is the accessible > > view for their application and I don't need to make any other views > > accessible. I think we need to have a requirement that all views are > > accessible. > >IJ: I don't think I agree. Maybe part of the problem is whether we're >talking about "view" or "viewport". > JRG: Quesions: 1. Is it views or view ports that make alternative equivalents available? 2. Do users make configuration adjustments on view ports or views? 2.a For example, if I change a font size, an I changing the view port or the view? 2.b For example, if I change the display property of a user style sheet from block to none. Have I changed the view or the view port? Thanks, Jon Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Chair, W3C WAI User Agent Working Group Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services College of Applied Life Studies University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: (217) 244-5870 Fax: (217) 333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
Received on Monday, 1 May 2000 13:32:58 UTC