- From: David Poehlman <poehlman@clark.net>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:38:27 -0400
- CC: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org, w3c-wai-pf@w3.org
Some thoughts. 1> It seems that there are three types of information. Let's call them data, instructions and rendered content or something like that. I think there should be a way to state that a source view is not sufficient without saying so if we employ the types of information being discussed appropriately. I am not certain as to what the propper positive way is but know that there is one. Just taking the sentence: "a source view is not sufficient." and turning it inside out can yeild: "the minimum requirement is that which results in all content being rendered in an intellegible way. I know. we have to define intellegible but I have done a lot of reading of this thread and will follow it to its conclusion and I am at this point now. If things become clearer for me, I will be happy to make them known. Thanks! -- Hands-On Technolog(eye)s ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/poehlman http://poehlman.clark.net mailto:poehlman@clark.net voice 301-949-7599 end sig.
Received on Thursday, 27 April 2000 13:38:32 UTC