- From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 14:16:21 -0600
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Attendance Chair: Jon Gunderson Scribe: Ian Jacobs RSVP Present: Charles McCathieNevile David Poehlman Harvey Bingham Kitch Barnicle Gregory J. Rosmaita Dick Brown Madeleine Rothberg Jim Allan Mickey Quenzer Rich Schwerdtfeger RSVP Regrets: Mark Novak Al Gilman Action Items Completed Action Items 1.IJ: Send revision of table checkpoint to the list AND include in last call document http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-WAI-USERAGENT-19991105 2.IJ: Mark relative priority of Checkpoint 6.1 as a current issue for the group and we want last call comments http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-WAI-USERAGENT-19991105 3.IJ: Prepare guidelines document for last call, based on todays discussion http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-WAI-USERAGENT-19991105 4.IJ: Prepare techniques document for last call, based on current unprocessed techniques submissions http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-WAI-USERAGENT-TECHS-19991105/ 5.IJ: Make 9 and 10 December F2F meeting at IBM in Austin, TX information available http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/1999/12/ua-agenda 6.HR: Find information about European contacts who may be interested in reviewing the document during last call Status: Dropped 7.MR: Working on SMIL techniques http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/1999OctDec/0267.html 8.AG: Send HTML discussion to list related to table markup http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/1999OctDec/0247.html Continued Action Items 1.IJ: Propose how the conformance checklist will be delivered 2.DB: Contact person in Windows media group to agree to review last call draft when available 3.MN: Contact someone at United Cerebral Palsy to agree to review last call draft when available Status: No response 4.MN: Suggest a last call reviewer at Apple computer Status: No response 5.MQ: Find someone from WinAmp, SigTuna to agree to review last call draft when available Status: still looking 6.TL: Get feedback from MS IE Team on usability of 5 October Techniques structure (wait for next draft). New Action Items 1.IJ: If W3C Comm Team develops a statement related to NFB vs. AOL, keep the UAGL WG informed. 2.IJ: Review techniques for topic 3.2 3.JG: Confirm 7 December telecon date with systems people 4.JG: Review techniques for Guideline 2 5.JG: Review techniques for Guideline 8 6.KB: Post information about Easy Access/Infrared technology to list as a proposal for inclusion in the techniques document 7.KB: Update impact matrix based on 5 November draft. 8.KB: Review techniques for Guideline 7 9.RS: Send last call document to IBM's Web Team in Austin. 10.RS: Review techniques for Guideline 1 11.JA: Review techniques for topic 3.1 12.JA: Review techniques for Guideline 3 13.JA: Review techniques for Guideline 4 14.MR: Review techniques for topic 3.1 (Multi-media) 15.MR: Review techniques for Guideline 3 (Multi-media) 16.MR: Review techniques for Guideline 4 (Multi-media) 17.DB: Contact Dave Bolnick about SAMI access. 18.DB: Review techniques for Guideline 5 19.CMN: Review techniques for Guideline 9 20.CMN: Review techniques for topic 3.6 21.MQ: Review techniques for Guideline 10 22.DP: Review techniques for Guideline 11 23.GR: Review techniques for Guideline 11 24.GR: Review techniques for topic 3.5 25.HB: Review techniques for topic 3.3 Minutes NOTE: Sign up for UAGL Austin Face-to-Face: 17 November deadline for hotel reservations (refer to [0]). 25 November deadline for meeting registration [0] [0] http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/1999/12/ua-agenda Agenda [1] [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/1999OctDec/0262.html 1) Action Item review 1.IJ: Propose how the conformance checklist will be delivered Status: Not Done. But did put a note in the last call guidelines. 2.2.IJ: Send revision of table checkpoint to the list AND include in last call document Done: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-WAI-USERAGENT-19991105 3.3.IJ: Mark relative priority of Checkpoint 6.1 as a current issue for the group and we want last call comments Done: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-WAI-USERAGENT-19991105 4.4.IJ: Prepare guidelines document for last call, based on todays discussion Done: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-WAI-USERAGENT-19991105 5.5.IJ: Prepare techniques document for last call, based on current unprocessed techniques submissions Done: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WD-WAI-USERAGENT-TECHS-19991105/ 6.6.IJ: Make 9 and 10 December F2F meeting at IBM in Austin, TX information available Done: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/1999/12/ua-agenda 7.7.HR: Find information about European contacts who may be interested in reviewing the document during last call JG: No info from HR. Status: Dropped for HR. GR: I've contacted some people. 8.8.TL: Get feedback from MS IE Team on usability of 5 October Techniques structure (wait for next draft). IJ: I'll follow up at MS next week. 9.9.MN: Contact someone at United Cerebral Palsy to agree to review last call draft when available 10.10.MN: Suggest a last call reviewer at Apple computer JG: MN has not reply yet from UCP or Apple. 11.11.MR: Working on SMIL techniques Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/1999OctDec/0267.html 12.12.DB: Contact person in Windows media group to agree to review last call draft when available Pending: Contacted Ian McDowell, no reply yet. 13.13.MQ: Find someone from WinAmp, SigTuna to agree to review last call draft when available 14.14.AG: Send HTML discussion to list related to table markup Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/1999OctDec/0242.html 2) AOL/NFB Lawsuit JG: I called Curtis Chong (of NFB) to review UAGL. I sent a generic email to AOL pointing them to the document. JG: I was contacted by NFB lawyers yesterday. IJ: Please don't speak as reps of W3C; instead forward any requests to W3C Comm Team. You should write to w3t-pr@w3.org and address Janet Daly and Ian Jacobs. Action Ian: If W3C Comm Team develops a statement, keep the UAGL WG informed. 3) Exceptional teleconf proposed for Tuesday 7 December. Regrets: HB (XML Conference), KB, CMN (down under). IJ: It seems as though Tobin bridge open from 12-1pm ET. Action JG: Confirm this date with systems people 4) Additional last call reviewers JB: Just send them the URL in the invitation to review and cc Jon or Ian. 5) WCAG is beginning rechartering process. Attend those teleconfs and send comments if you wish. 6) Techniques Document review. DEADLINE FOR TECHNIQUES: 17 November (preferable 15 November). IJ: If you come upon an issue during a review, please send issues to the list in individual emails (not as part of a larger techniques document). IJ: Please send *specific* techniques. My apologies for current language/inconsistencies/unreadability. 1.1: Be more specific to mouse and keyboard. IJ: Problems? HB: Some table questions not yet resolved. JG: Propose that if an accessible API is not available, then implement one. IJ: I don't think we should require them to implement additional APIs. MR: It sounds like some devices don't have keyboard API. IJ: Requirement to use keyboard API in systems where it's standard. KB: Does this have to be a checkpoint? Or can it be a technique? GR: I can see the utility of such a checkpoint. But at this point in the process, I don't know whether we know enough to make its own checkpoint. KB: So would the checkpoint say "Whatever device you're using, provide an accessible way to access it." IJ: I think hardware requirements are out of scope. We haven't discussed "devices" before, only software. DP: Some systems that have only a user agent (i.e., not a UA on top of an operating system). Action KB: Post information about Easy Access/Infrared technology to list. Technique review and expansions: Jim Allan: Propose CSS Techniques (section 3.1 and individual checkpoints, notably of G3 and G4.) User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Guideline 1. Support input and output device-independence Review by: Rich Schwerdtfeger Guideline 2. Ensure user access to all content Review by: Jon Gunderson Guideline 3. Allow the user to turn off rendering or behavior that may reduce accessibility Review by: Jim Allan, Madeliene Rothberg (multi-media) Guideline 4. Ensure user control over styles Reviewer: Jim Allan, Madeleine Rothberg (multi-media) Guideline 5. Observe operating system conventions and standard interfaces Reviewer: Dick Brown Guideline 6. Implement open specifications and their accessibility features Reviewer: none, see references fo MR SMIL and SAMI techniques, DB will ask someone from Microsoft Multi-media to review Guideline 7. Provide navigation mechanisms Reviewer: Kitch Barnicle Guideline 8. Help orient the user Reviewer: Jon Gunderson Guideline 9. Notify the user of content and viewport changes Reviewer: Charlese McCathieNevile Guideline 10. Allow the user to configure the user agent Reviewer: Mickey Quenzer Guideline 11. Provide accessible product documentation and help Reviewer: Gregory J. Rosmaita, David Poehlman Accessibility Topics 3.1 User control of style Reviewer: Jim Allan 3.2 Link techniques Reviewer: Ian Jacons 3.3 Table techniques Reviewer: Harvey Bingham 3.4 Frame techniques Reviewer: none 3.5 Form techniques Reviewer: Gregory J. Rosmaita 3.6 Script techniques Reviewer: Charles McCathieNevile 3.7 Abbreviations and acronyms Reviewer: none IJ: Review Madeleine's techniques (for G2). JA: A lot of MR's techniques fall into Guideline on control of style. IJ: Goal: a) Have a technique for each checkpoint. b) Ensure that every checkpoint implemented in some browser. Action RS: Send last call document to IBM's Web Team in Austin. JG: Any documented accessibility features of SAMI? Action DB: Contact Dave Bolnick about SAMI access. Note: IJ and CMN will be at MS next week to discuss Guidelines with IE Team. JG: Add a new topic: Extensibility of user agent UI. (add menu items, add code, etc.) GR: Is this using visual basic? JG: Not necessarily. You can add menu items and code. RS: You can add chrome around browsing window. You can embed the browsing component in a separate application. JG: You can add items to the registry. IJ: Seems to me to be covered by the configuration Guideline. RS: We haven't discussed embedding browser into other applications (e.g., specific look and feel for a particular disability). 7) On checkpoint 10.2 DB: Would prefer P3, but can live with P2. Still waiting for review. 8) RS: "Implement" or "Support" HTML 4.0? IJ: "Support" for things without specs. "Implement" for things with specs. 9) No last call comments have come in yet! 10) Bryan Campbell's concern about deletion of keyboard Guideline. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/1999OctDec/0254.html JG: We'll have this on our list of last call issues. JG: Will discuss further at face-to-face based on other input as well. GR: I've talked to Bryan a little off-line to reassure him. GR supports keyboard, but felt it was logically inconsistent to push for device independence while emphasizing keyboard. Pointed Bryan to initial proposal and asked to review last call draft to see if his concerns were addressed. 11) Impact matrix Action KB: Update impact matrix based on 5 November draft. 12) Current appendix for dependent UA functionalities IJ: Does anyone have any objections? None. Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Chair, W3C WAI User Agent Working Group Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services College of Applied Life Studies University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: (217) 244-5870 Fax: (217) 333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 1999 15:18:16 UTC