- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charlesn@srl.rmit.EDU.AU>
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 21:51:17 +1100 (EST)
- To: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>
- cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Both Scott and Al have suggesteed that being able to navigate the document tree does not provide sufficient table navigation. I was proposing it as a bare minimum solution. I also asssumed that User Agents would allow some sensible context-sensitive methods of identifying the shape of the tree (rather than 'next element across or next element up/down' it would suggest 'next cell, or next row, or ...') However I agree that it would not provide anything much better than bare access - perhaps half a step above providing the view source option for people to work out what is going on. So I would like to see a better solution (like those outlined by Scott and Al) implemented in browsers themselves. The question then becomes 'is your User Agent a medium-specific tool, of no real value outside a small set of hardware/software combinations, or is it a full browser engine which supports medium-independent browsing (either natively or via plug-ins, which is the consequent question)?'. The Real-Video player seems to fall into the former category, although their SMIL player (G2?) could, for SMIL content, be in the latter. Where do MSIE, pwWebSpeak, etc, see themselves? Charles McCathieNevile
Received on Sunday, 15 November 1998 05:55:33 UTC